1995
DOI: 10.2307/3096852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who Supports the Troops? Vietnam, the Gulf War, and the Making of Collective Memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RAs, however, do hope to discredit their challengers and in doing so remove the threat to the imagery. It is conceivable that these justifications may compel challengers to waste resources demonstrating the soundness of their characters (see Beamish, Molotch, and Flacks 1995).…”
Section: Public Accountsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RAs, however, do hope to discredit their challengers and in doing so remove the threat to the imagery. It is conceivable that these justifications may compel challengers to waste resources demonstrating the soundness of their characters (see Beamish, Molotch, and Flacks 1995).…”
Section: Public Accountsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collective representations embodied in soldiers killed in the line of duty amplify the political nature of funerary rites. "Support the troops" is a sentiment so strong and near unanimous in the post-Vietnam United States that even anti-war protesters must operate around and through this moral sentiment to receive a favorable hearing in public discourse (see Beamish, Molotch, and Flacks 1995;Coy, Woehrle, and Maney 2008;Stahl 2009). …”
Section: The Politics Of Deviance Protest and Blood Sacrificementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One type of institutionalization is the tendency of movements and activists to get co‐opted and saddled with myths that sap their power. A myth that spread about anti‐war movements said they were intensely unpatriotic and commonly spat on returning Vietnam veterans; even contemporary anti‐war activists construct frames in reaction to this mythic history (Beamish et al ). Nelson Mandela is typically remembered as only a leader of peaceful legislative change, and not also a leader of an armed revolutionary movement; this myth lauds institutionalized politics and forgets the importance of anti‐colonial revolution (Seidman ).…”
Section: Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%