2018
DOI: 10.1002/soej.12264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who succeeds in distance learning? Evidence from quantile panel data estimation

Abstract: This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the distributional effects of distance learning (DL) on academic success, as measured by course grades and completion. Using data of over 1.2 million courses taken by about 200,000 U.S. Navy sailor‐students at more than 1800 U.S. institutions during 1994–2007, we find that distance delivery of education is associated with poorer outcomes. At the mean, DL delivery is associated with 0.19 lower course grade points; however, the mean effect masks the more pronounced… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have investigated whether differences between online and traditional course formats hold when students are split into high and low performing groups (e.g., based on overall course performance or GPA). Findings provide support for the negative effect of online learning across both performance groups, with the largest differences observed in low performing student populations (Bacolod, Mehay, & Pema, 2018;Lu & Lemonde, 2012;Sanford, 2017). Students with low GPAs are found to perform even worse in online courses compared to face-to-face (Cavanaugh & Jacquemin, 2015;Cummings, Chaffin, & Cockerham, 2015;Fendler, Ruff, & Shrikhande, 2016;Johnson & Palmer, 2015).…”
Section: Racementioning
confidence: 73%
“…Several studies have investigated whether differences between online and traditional course formats hold when students are split into high and low performing groups (e.g., based on overall course performance or GPA). Findings provide support for the negative effect of online learning across both performance groups, with the largest differences observed in low performing student populations (Bacolod, Mehay, & Pema, 2018;Lu & Lemonde, 2012;Sanford, 2017). Students with low GPAs are found to perform even worse in online courses compared to face-to-face (Cavanaugh & Jacquemin, 2015;Cummings, Chaffin, & Cockerham, 2015;Fendler, Ruff, & Shrikhande, 2016;Johnson & Palmer, 2015).…”
Section: Racementioning
confidence: 73%
“…Learner performance can be defined and measured in numerous methods that are not limited to course completion, grade point average, and skill development [30]. Online education has been found to have detrimental effects on both high-achieving and low-achieving students, with a particular emphasis on the negative impact it has on the latter group [31][32][33]. The aforementioned figures provide evidence in favor of the assertion that online instruction has negative implications for instructors' professional trajectories.…”
Section: Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies based on observational data find negative effects of online lectures on learning (Bacolod et al, 2018 ; Bettinger et al, 2017 ; Xu & Jaggars, 2014 ). However, by comparing the estimates from observational and experimental data, Joyce et al ( 2015 ) argue that the former are likely to overestimate the effect of face-to-face lectures.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%