2016
DOI: 10.1080/10350330.2016.1145371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who stands for the norm? The place of metonymy in androcentric language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the metonymic mapping, it is structured by an idealised cognitive model defining how knowledge is organised in connection with the cultural, linguistic and natural worlds, and the mapping is realised via a linkage through pragmatic function where the source domain mentally activates the target domain. Consequently, metonymy has a conceptual effect that it experientially entails one (sub)domain to be foregrounded or highlighted by another in the matrix, and conceptual metonymy forms natural inference that are employed by participants in linguistic communication in order to derive utterance meaning Lakoff 1987, Radden and K vecses 1999, Croft 2002, Panther and Thornburg 2003, arcelona 2007, K vecses 2010, Martin and Papadelos 2017.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for the metonymic mapping, it is structured by an idealised cognitive model defining how knowledge is organised in connection with the cultural, linguistic and natural worlds, and the mapping is realised via a linkage through pragmatic function where the source domain mentally activates the target domain. Consequently, metonymy has a conceptual effect that it experientially entails one (sub)domain to be foregrounded or highlighted by another in the matrix, and conceptual metonymy forms natural inference that are employed by participants in linguistic communication in order to derive utterance meaning Lakoff 1987, Radden and K vecses 1999, Croft 2002, Panther and Thornburg 2003, arcelona 2007, K vecses 2010, Martin and Papadelos 2017.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another notable metonymy is THE QUALIFICATION FOR THE PERSON, viz. the substitution theory of metonymy Seto 1999, arcelona 2003, Panther and Thornburg 2007, K vecses 2010, Martin and Papadelos 2017.…”
Section: Conceptual Metonymymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cognitive linguistics, metonymy and synecdoche are often believed to instantiate the same conceptual phenomenon (Dalpanagioti, 2018;Martin & Papadelos, 2017;Mittelberg, 2018;Nguyen, 2017). Lakoff & Johnson (1980) see metonymy as a predominantly referential shift phenomenon within one cognitive domain.…”
Section: Conceptual Metonymymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, androcentric discourse upholds the patriarchy and creates gender polarisation, it positions man and woman as profoundly different from one another which in turn reproduces androcentric discourse and maintains the hierarchal social order (Bailey & LaFrance, 2017;Bem, 1993). Androcentric discourse is highly critiqued by post-feminist theory in problematising the reciprocal relationships between genders (Martin & Papadelos, 2017). This type of androcentric discourse becomes embedded in traditions, mannerisms and language, which perpetuates these constructs (Bailey & LaFrance, 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%