Who sets the agenda in Thailand? Identifying key actors in Thai corruption policy, 2012–2016

Dyussenov, Mergen

doi:10.1080/17516234.2017.1326448

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For me, I would give opportunities to those who may not be the best, but those who have made an improvement compared to performance in the past." (L7)4.1.3 | Virtue, integrity, and honestyBribery and favoritism have been widely recognized as issues that need to be addressed across the Thai public sector(Dyussenov, 2017;Prateeppornnarong & Young, 2019). In complementing this body of research, most of the interviewees involved in the current study stated that corruption is one of the most severe problems in the Thai public sector; they then emphasized that virtue, integrity, and honesty are core ethical values.…”

mentioning

confidence: 87%

The use of mindfulness to promote ethical decision making and behavior: Empirical evidence from the public sector in Thailand

Sutamchai

Rowlands

Rees

2019

Public Admin & Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary The study has two main purposes. First, the study explores core ethical values and behaviors from the perspective of Thai public service organizational leaders. Second, the study investigates the extent to which public sector leaders in Thailand consider Buddhist‐based mindfulness practice to be a potentially effective mechanism for reinforcing core ethical values and behaviors in the public sector in Thailand. Using interview data derived from in‐depth semi‐structured interviews with 12 senior public sector officials in Thailand, the analysis elicits four dimensions of core ethical values and behaviors that are perceived by Thai public service organizational leaders as central to ethical behavior in the public sector. The study also sheds light on the interviewees' positive perceptions towards mindfulness and the role its associated practices can play in promoting ethical decision making and behavior in the public sector in Thailand.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 87%

The use of mindfulness to promote ethical decision making and behavior: Empirical evidence from the public sector in Thailand

Sutamchai

Rowlands

Rees

2019

Public Admin & Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Who Sets the Agenda? Analyzing Key Actors and Dynamics of Economic Diversification in Kazakhstan Throughout 2011–2016

Dyussenov

2019

Public Policy Research in the Global South

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Anti-corruption commissions: lessons for the Asia-Pacific region from a proposed Australian federal anti-corruption watchdog

Rama¹,

Lester²

2019

Asia Pacific Business Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reviews the experience of anti-corruption commissions in the region and argues that the debate on the establishment of a national anti-corruption body in Australia is dependent on the country's political culture, institutions and elites. Corruption and integrity coexist and are conceived as the obverse and converse respectively, of a functional and dysfunctional system. Anti-corruption bodies in the Asia-Pacific region are compared against applicable global anti-corruption frameworks, policies and principles. The paper proposes a conceptual model for a National Integrity Ecosystem (NIE), premised on community values and trust and situates the Australian experience within such an ecosystem. A federal anticorruption watchdog is the missing piece in Australia's institutional infrastructure. Its acceptance and effectiveness requires difficult and sustained change in the underlying political culture of the country and its elites.

show abstract

Who sets the agenda in Thailand? Identifying key actors in Thai corruption policy, 2012–2016

Cited by 5 publications

References 6 publications

The use of mindfulness to promote ethical decision making and behavior: Empirical evidence from the public sector in Thailand

The use of mindfulness to promote ethical decision making and behavior: Empirical evidence from the public sector in Thailand

Who Sets the Agenda? Analyzing Key Actors and Dynamics of Economic Diversification in Kazakhstan Throughout 2011–2016

Anti-corruption commissions: lessons for the Asia-Pacific region from a proposed Australian federal anti-corruption watchdog

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About