Who Seeks Clear Aligner Therapy? A European Cross-National Real-World Data Analysis

Baxmann, Martin; Timm, Lan Huong; Schwendicke, Falk

doi:10.3390/life13010065

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As mentioned above, CAT is not indicated in all cases of dental realignment, and the technology has some limitations as well. [ 81 82 83 84 ] One should not use CAT in cases of severe crowding or spacing issues that require extractions. Furthermore, despite the positive experiences in the case of anterior crossbites, some bite problems can be too complex for CAT to work well.…”

Section: Indicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clear Aligner Therapy: Up to date review article

AlMogbel

2023

J Orthodont Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The advantages of Clear Aligners Therapy (CAT) include the braces being virtually invisible, comfortable to wear, and removable for eating and brushing; that way, CAT can be used to treat a wide range of orthodontic issues. In 1999, the company Align Technology introduced the frst commercial clear aligner system called Invisalign. The Invisalign system was initially only available to orthodontists, but later became available to general dentists as well. The system quickly gained popularity among patients who were looking for a more discreet and comfortable alternative to traditional braces. In 2000, Align Technology received FDA clearance for the Invisalign system, which further increased its popularity. The biomechanics of clear aligners involve the use of custom-made tooth aligners that are specifcally shaped to guide teeth into desired positions. These aligners are typically made from flexible materials such as polyurethane or ethylene vinyl acetate and are adjusted to apply the necessary forces for tooth movement. Attachment devices, such as power ridges or buttons, are often used to enhance or assist in specifc tooth movements and for retention of the aligner. The use of attachments allows for the exertion of desired force on the teeth, which is crucial for the success of Clear Aligner Therapy. CAT should be used if patients are concerned about the esthetic appearances of their teeth—for example, actors and other individuals that rely on their appearances in public in a professional context—and if the misalignment is not severe, so that clear aligners can still work. One should not use CAT in cases of severe crowding or spacing issues that require extractions. If the patient has complex jaw discrepancies or skeletal issues or if teeth need to be moved extensively in multiple directions, CAT is likely not going to be strong enough. In conclusion, Clear Aligner Therapy is a safe, effective, and convenient orthodontic treatment option that offers patients a virtually invisible way to achieve a straighter, more beautiful smile. With continued advancements in technology and a growing body of research supporting its effectiveness, the future of Clear Aligner Therapy looks bright.

show abstract

Section: Indicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clear Aligner Therapy: Up to date review article

AlMogbel

2023

J Orthodont Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Significance of radiographic temporomandibular radiographic degenerative joint disease findings

Wadhwa,

Skelton,

Fernandez

et al. 2023

Seminars in Orthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparison of Clear Aligner Treatment in First-Treatment and Re-Treatment Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Timm¹,

Rößler

Baxmann³

2023

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This retrospective real-world study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of clear aligner treatment (CAT) and patient demographics of patients seeking orthodontic re-treatment who had previously received orthodontic treatment in childhood or adolescence. The study was conducted using anonymized data from DrSmile (Berlin, Germany), a CAT provider in Europe. Data were collected from a total of 2080 patients in Germany (71.5% female, 28.5% male, ranging from 18–70 years, median 29.0 years), who completed their CAT between 1 June and 30 June 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: adult first-treatment patients (n = 1587) and adult re-treatment patients (n = 493). Results showed that re-treatment patients had a shorter treatment duration (p < 0.05), required fewer interproximal reductions (IPR) (p < 0.001), and had fewer clinical visits (mean 2.96 versus 4.14 visits) than first-treatment patients (p < 0.001). Data collected from adult orthodontic re-treatment and first-treatment patients indicated that the demographic characteristics of these two groups were very similar. No significant differences were found between re-treatment patients and first-treatment patients in terms of motives for orthodontic treatment (p = 0.068), types of insurance (p = 0.615), and treatment satisfaction (p = 0.673). The study highlights the need for orthodontists and dentists to provide adequate information to patients about long-term retention and decision-making for orthodontic treatment, especially for re-treatment.

show abstract

Who Seeks Clear Aligner Therapy? A European Cross-National Real-World Data Analysis

Cited by 4 publications

References 43 publications

Clear Aligner Therapy: Up to date review article

Clear Aligner Therapy: Up to date review article

Significance of radiographic temporomandibular radiographic degenerative joint disease findings

Comparison of Clear Aligner Treatment in First-Treatment and Re-Treatment Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About