2003
DOI: 10.1093/applin/24.4.519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who's Helping Whom?: Learner/Heritage-Speakers' Networked Discussions in Spanish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
98
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
11
98
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding substantiates the claims that SCMC offers potential for learners to attend to linguistic form (Smith, 2003a;Warschauer, 1997) and complements the findings of other SCMC interaction studies that showed that through meaning negotiation learners focus on form (Blake, 2000;Blake & Zyzik, 2003;de la Fuente, 2003;Iwasaki & Oliver, 2003;Kitade, 2000;Lee, 2002;Pellettieri, 2000;Smith, 2003a;Toyoda & Harrison, 2002;Tudini, 2003). The study has added to our understanding of learners' focus on form behavior through SCMC by documenting the instances where a form focus did not arise as a result of a communication problem.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This finding substantiates the claims that SCMC offers potential for learners to attend to linguistic form (Smith, 2003a;Warschauer, 1997) and complements the findings of other SCMC interaction studies that showed that through meaning negotiation learners focus on form (Blake, 2000;Blake & Zyzik, 2003;de la Fuente, 2003;Iwasaki & Oliver, 2003;Kitade, 2000;Lee, 2002;Pellettieri, 2000;Smith, 2003a;Toyoda & Harrison, 2002;Tudini, 2003). The study has added to our understanding of learners' focus on form behavior through SCMC by documenting the instances where a form focus did not arise as a result of a communication problem.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Furthermore, CMC tools are fruitfully implemented in comparative studies on the language behaviour and development of L2 and HL learners. Blake & Zyzik (2003), for instance, used a synchronous CMC environment (online connection via the university's RTA chat programme) in a paired HL-to-L2 learner task to observe the learners' linguistic behaviour (miscommunications, negotiations, etc.) and explore whether the interaction via the CMC tools is mutually beneficiary for both groups of speakers or not.…”
Section: Call In the Heritage Language Classroommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blake and Zyzik (2003) suggest that the demands of electronic chatting seem to force participants to produce the target language (pushed output), offering the Spanish heritage speakers 1 in their study a chance to expand their grammatical, textual, illocutionary, and sociolinguistic competencies.…”
Section: Output In Synchronous Computer-mediated Communication (Scmc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond fostering pushed output, however, there is also an indication that the text-based CMC medium can amplify students' attention to linguistic form during production (Blake & Zyzik, 2003;Pellettieri, 1999), offering learners sufficient opportunity to notice lexical and grammatical features in the input and their own output. Two features of the text-based CMC medium in particular may be responsible for fostering attention to linguistic form: the slower pace of turn-taking (relative to spoken interaction), and the enduring visual record of the chat window.…”
Section: Output In Synchronous Computer-mediated Communication (Scmc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation