2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who's got the global advantage? Visual field differences in processing of global and local shape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(60 reference statements)
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is important, but not because global organizations always carry meaningful information for making summary judgments (the shape of a crowd of faces is unlikely to have any relevance for a judgment about their average emotion, for example). Rather, our findings pertain more broadly to the ensemble mechanism itselfthey clarify what kinds of visual information can be included in ensemble codes, and they reposition the mechanism more comfortably with decades of work indicating that local and global processing interact, with global-or gist-level information taking precedence (Kimchi, 2015;Navon, 1977;Nie et al, 2017) or being available to awareness first (Gerlach & Poirel, 2020). Our results suggest that summary representations are formed at a timepoint after the parallel and distinct processing of local and global information is complete (Flevaris & Robertson, 2016;Hübner & Volberg, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This finding is important, but not because global organizations always carry meaningful information for making summary judgments (the shape of a crowd of faces is unlikely to have any relevance for a judgment about their average emotion, for example). Rather, our findings pertain more broadly to the ensemble mechanism itselfthey clarify what kinds of visual information can be included in ensemble codes, and they reposition the mechanism more comfortably with decades of work indicating that local and global processing interact, with global-or gist-level information taking precedence (Kimchi, 2015;Navon, 1977;Nie et al, 2017) or being available to awareness first (Gerlach & Poirel, 2020). Our results suggest that summary representations are formed at a timepoint after the parallel and distinct processing of local and global information is complete (Flevaris & Robertson, 2016;Hübner & Volberg, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…2). We elected to use object-substitution masking (i.e., OSM; Enns, 2004;Enns & Di Lollo, 1997;Goodhew et al, 2013) because it was useful for disrupting visual awareness of our shape stimuli in a previous investigation (Braun & Sweeny, 2019;Elias et al, 2018), but we acknowledge that other forms of masking (e.g., metacontrast or backward masking) could have met our needs as well. We note that this was not an investigation of OSM, so we limit our discussion of its mechanisms and simply note that we selected dot sizes, distances, and timing parameters based on values that produced effective masking in our previous work (Braun & Sweeny, 2019;Elias et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations