Development, Civil Society and Faith-Based Organizations 2008
DOI: 10.1057/9780230371262_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who’s Afraid of Religion? Tensions between ‘Mission’ and ‘Development’ in the Norwegian Mission Society

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…development organisations on the one hand, and 'faith' communities on the other, as if they were separate entities, with the latter to be used for the former's ends. This division between 'secular' and 'religious' has been questioned in the literature (see Ager and Ager, 2011;Calhoun et al, 2011;Deneulin & Bano, 2009;Hovland, 2007;Leurs, 2012;Linden, 2007;Olivier 2016;Smith, 2017…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…development organisations on the one hand, and 'faith' communities on the other, as if they were separate entities, with the latter to be used for the former's ends. This division between 'secular' and 'religious' has been questioned in the literature (see Ager and Ager, 2011;Calhoun et al, 2011;Deneulin & Bano, 2009;Hovland, 2007;Leurs, 2012;Linden, 2007;Olivier 2016;Smith, 2017…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closely related to the above is what Hovland [33] identifies as the secularisation of project, an ideological stance advanced by Enlightenment thinkers, which stipulates a stern bifurcation of religion from politics in liberal democracies, and which eventually resonated into realignment and relegation of religion to the private sphere. By this, faith, particularly from Western perception, was regarded as an irrelevant issue as far as development was concerned.…”
Section: Faith and Work: The Discourse On Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Communities of different faiths (or denominations within the shared faith) may fear they will be excluded or targeted for proselytization under the cover of development. Donors often share such fears and insist on the creation of artificial impermeable boundaries between ‘faith’ and ‘development’ activities, reinforcing the idea that both operate separately and independently (Aiken, 2010, James, 2011; Hovland, 2008). As Tomalin (2020) notes, donors have taken a ‘selective and normative’ approach to engaging with religion in development.…”
Section: Faith Identity and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%