Who reports high company performance? A quantitative study of Chinese listed companies in the energy industry

Abstract

In the increasingly competitive environment, top managers’ background characteristics are undoubtedly vital factors for company performance. This study examines whether the performance of Chinese listed companies in the energy industry differs with respect to top managers’ background characteristics and explores the exact distribution interval of top managers’ background characteristics when company performance reaches the highest level. The initial sample was collected from the CSMAR database (2005–2014) for listed companies in the energy industry. After removing the outlier and missing data, the final number of observations was determined as 780. Descriptive statistics were used to investigate the present distribution of top managers’ background characteristics, factor analysis was used to determine the dimensions of company performance, and one-way ANOVA was used to analyze the differences in company performance and its dimensions with respect to top managers’ background characteristics. The findings show that both the age and length of service of top managers present an increasing trend over the years of the study period, whereas the educational level shows no significant changes. The performance of listed companies has three dimensions: profit performance, growth performance, and operating performance. Companies behave differently with regard to their top managers’ background characteristics; when the top manager is 40–45 years old, with a doctoral degree and above, and in the 2nd–3rd year of his service period, his company will achieve a higher level of performance. This study contributes to the growing literature on company performance in the Chinese energy industry by demonstrating the differences in the performance of Chinese listed companies in the energy industry with regard to top managers’ background characteristics, and reaching conclusions on the optimum distribution interval of top managers’ background characteristics when company performance reaches the highest level. This study also provides a valuable reference for organizational reform and performance enhancement, which are urgent problems for the Chinese energy industry.

A Hybrid Approach for Predicting Corporate Financial Risk: Integrating SMOTE-ENN and NGBoost

“…The CRITIC-TOPSIS method relies on mathematical matrix operations, making the selection of appropriate indicator data crucial for an effective evaluation of financial risk. In this study, a comprehensive approach was taken by combining previous research [41,42], considering the specific characteristics of Chinese listed companies [43], a careful screening and division process was applied to the initially gathered 46 indicators, excluding less indicative variables for enterprise performance prediction and eliminating similar variables. As a result, an index system comprising 27 indicators at 6 levels was constructed.…”

A Comprehensive Model of the Relationship between Miners’ Work Commitment, Cultural Emotion and Unemployment Risk Perception

“…If the p value is greater than the significance level α (α is set as 0.05), it means that the variance is homogeneous, and the F test can be selected; if the p value is less than the significance level α (α is set as 0.05), this indicates that the variance is not homogeneous, and the F test cannot be selected. According to the research conducted by Welch [68] and Guo et al [69], when the variances are not homogeneous, the Welch test can be selected to compare the differences between the means of each group. The homogeneity of variance test of individual personality characteristics is shown in Table 6.…”