2023
DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2023.2176352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who Posts Fake News? Authentic and Inauthentic Spreaders of Fabricated News on Facebook and Twitter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as outlined above, the term "fake news" unhelpfully limits our understanding of problematic news content. This is because verifiably "false" news, as tracked by Vosoughi et al (2018) or Dourado (2023), is only a subset of such problematic content. Other forms include outright conspiracist news sites, hyperpartisan outlets that use selective sourcing and bad-faith news frames to push specific political agendas, state-backed disinformation campaigns, as well as more mundane forms of false information (i.e., misinformation) sharing on social media.…”
Section: Approaches To Studying the Spread Of Problematic "News" Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as outlined above, the term "fake news" unhelpfully limits our understanding of problematic news content. This is because verifiably "false" news, as tracked by Vosoughi et al (2018) or Dourado (2023), is only a subset of such problematic content. Other forms include outright conspiracist news sites, hyperpartisan outlets that use selective sourcing and bad-faith news frames to push specific political agendas, state-backed disinformation campaigns, as well as more mundane forms of false information (i.e., misinformation) sharing on social media.…”
Section: Approaches To Studying the Spread Of Problematic "News" Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This produces valuable results, but its observations cannot easily be generalized, for example, to hyperpartisan news that is not explicitly false, but instead presents facts selectively and out of context, or to biased news commentary that makes its claims without providing a factual basis and is therefore more difficult to debunk effectively. Likewise, Dourado (2023) produced a compelling account of the nature of over 1,000 online accounts that shared any of 57 fact-checked "fake news" articles relating to the 2018 Brazilian presidential election, but this approach cannot capture the circulation of other problematic content that did not come to the attention of fact-checking organizations. We do not intend to diminish the importance and rigor of these studies, but point out their (acknowledged) limitations: they rely on a small database of fact-checked "fake" articles and limit their scope to a singular event.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spread of fake news can have a huge detrimental effect on social issues and threatens to disrupt the news ecosystem, people, and society. The most famous fake news example is in the 2016 United States presidential election was widely circulated on Facebook [2]. Rapidly increasing the number of users of high-speed internet and hand-held devices and advanced digital media.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%