“Who polluted the Potomac?” The translation and implementation of a US environmental story in Brazilian and Turkish classrooms

Abstract

In this study we examine how elementary teachers in Brazil and Turkey approached the translation and subsequent classroom implementation of an instructional activity that promotes environmental awareness through a combination of student role playing and teacher oral delivery of an environmental story about river pollution. A discourse analysis showed that translation into Portuguese was literal, an approach that fostered a classroom implementation that emphasized detached transmission of knowledge (the teacher frequently interrupted her delivery to provide textual, contextual and recontextualizing information to students). In contrast, translation into Turkish was free, that is, with many modifications that led to a decontextualized and detached text. Implementation of this text was focused on the creation of student involvement, being dominated by oral strategies such as religious analogies (heaven and hell), and parallel repetitions of statements of shared guilt. Based on these findings, it was concluded that neither translation promoted an equivalent form of environmental instruction (i.e., involved transmission of environmental knowledge). Furthermore, an argument is made that effective translation requires that original and translated curricula foster analogous levels of involvement (or detachment) as well as equivalent forms of classroom relationships and social roles (pragmatic equivalence).Bu çalışmada Brezilya ve Türkiye'deki ilkokul ögretmenlerinin bir hikayenin başka bir dile çevrilmesi ve bu hikayenin sınıf ortamında bir etkinlik ile ögretilmesi ve karşılaştırmalı incelenmesi yapıldı. Burada temel amaç ögrencilerin süreçte aktif bir

Language Repair Strategies in Bilingual Tutoring of Mathematics Word Problems

“…Because some English words and grammatical structures lacked a precise equivalent in the target language, adaptations such as replacements, deletions, additions, and structural changes were repeatedly needed. This finding supports the contention that translating a text is more than simply establishing semantic equivalence (i.e., unproblematically and directly finding equivalent words, phrases, and texts in a target language; Oliveira, Colak, & Akerson, 2009). When a written text is transferred to another language, the translator has to transpose not only referential meanings (the literal message of the text) but also more problematic nonliteral meanings that often require a degree of free translation (adaptation of the linguistic message).…”

Issues and techniques in translating scientific terms from English to Khmer for a university-level text in Cambodia

“…In particular, like Beaton et al (2000), we found that the use of back-translation was very useful in identifying translation difficulties. Further research into this important approach to analysing the quality of translated texts is crucial if we are to encourage the adoption of the most efficient translation practices and promote effective scientific instruction worldwide (Oliveira, Colak, & Akerson, 2009). Although there are many online resources that allow for quick translation, these services often employ only literal translation techniques, paying little attention to context or cultural meaning.…”

Environmental argumentation as sociocultural activity

“…Overall, translation into Portuguese was literal, that is, without any significant alterations to the referential contents of the original dilemma cards. For a more information about the curriculum translation process and its implementation, see Oliveira, Colak, and Akerson (2009a, 2009b) and Oliveira and Dhingra (2008).…”