2020
DOI: 10.1108/jpif-12-2019-0157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who performs better? AVMs vs hedonic models

Abstract: PurposeIn the literature there are numerous tests that compare the accuracy of automated valuation models (AVMs). These models first train themselves with price data and property characteristics, then they are tested by measuring their ability to predict prices. Most of them compare the effectiveness of traditional econometric models against the use of machine learning algorithms. Although the latter seem to offer better performance, there is not yet a complete survey of the literature to confirm the hypothesi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Better prediction accuracy of ANNs compared to regression pricing models was reported by Moreno-Izquierdo et al (2018), Tabales et al (2013), Kutasi and Badics (2016), and Abidoye and Chan (2018) [7,[14][15][16]. These results are also supported by the literature review by Valier (2020), which examined research papers analyzing the accuracy of automated valuation models [32]. ANNs were indicated as more effective and reliable for mass evaluation of residential properties compared to regression models in 29 research papers.…”
Section: -Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Better prediction accuracy of ANNs compared to regression pricing models was reported by Moreno-Izquierdo et al (2018), Tabales et al (2013), Kutasi and Badics (2016), and Abidoye and Chan (2018) [7,[14][15][16]. These results are also supported by the literature review by Valier (2020), which examined research papers analyzing the accuracy of automated valuation models [32]. ANNs were indicated as more effective and reliable for mass evaluation of residential properties compared to regression models in 29 research papers.…”
Section: -Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Future Price [60] Used Jointly SVR LASSO Transport Future Demand [26] Used Jointly RF FE-R Trade Future Performance [46] Used Jointly DL Regression Tourism Future Performance [53] ML outperforms SVR/KNN PCR Tourism Future Price [72] ML outperfoms AVM ML Regression investment Theorical [22] ML outperfoms ANN Regression Tourism Future Demand [2] ML outperfoms DNN ARIMA Investment Future Price [27] Used Jointly SVR LASSO Transport Future price [47] ML outperforms NN ARIMA Investment Future Price [69] Used Jointly D-ML Regression Theorical Theorical Method [38], [62] [15], [31], [29], [14], [56] [17]…”
Section: Ga Hodrick-prescott Stock Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the rise of machine learning and applications to automated valuation models in real estate, the future of valuation is likely to be automated. However, the success of these models will rely heavily on making sure the users understand how the new technologies work so they can comprehend their inherent strengths and possible weaknesses (Valier, 2020).…”
Section: Impact Of Industry 40mentioning
confidence: 99%