Body weight-supported treadmill training (BWSTT), robotic-assistive step training (RAST), and associated techniques for locomotor training (LT) have not proven superior to exercise and progressive over-ground gait training (OGT) to improve walking for motor impaired patients with stroke, spinal cord injury (SCI), multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, and cerebral palsy. This conclusion, based on scientifically conducted, randomized clinical trials (RCTs), is most disappointing. 1 The authors bet heavily on BWSTT as a neurophysiologically sound strategy for moderate to severely impaired patients after SCI 2 and stroke. 3 After over a dozen years of mostly uncontrolled pilot studies and underpowered trials, we initiated and completed an adequately powered, multicenter RCT of BWSTT plus OGT for patients with recent traumatic, incomplete SCI who could still not walk without maximal assistance by 6 weeks after onset. We compared this strategy with conventional progressive OGT. 4 In a second RCT, also supported by peer review and funding from the National Institutes of Health, we compared BWSTT with progressive exercise in the home that did not include any formal practice for walking, starting at either 2 or 6 months after stroke in highly disabled (walking speed <0.4 m/s) and moderately disabled (initial walking speed 0.4 to <0.8 m/s) hemiparetic participants. 5 The participants were identified at the time of their inpatient rehabilitation, unlike earlier pilot studies of BWSTT, in which subjects were usually a convenience sample drawn from volunteers in the community. Baseline variability among groups in the Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial (SCILT) and the Locomotor Experience Applied Post Stroke (LEAPS) trial was negligible, because the entry criteria had been well defined. The technique for the 439687N NRXXX10.