2009
DOI: 10.1002/fut.20351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who knows more about future currency volatility?

Abstract: to compare the predictive power of the implied volatility derived from currency option prices that are traded on the Philadelphia Stock Exchange (PHLX), Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), and over-the-counter market (OTC). Among the competing implied volatility forecasts, OTC-implied volatility subsumes the information content of PHLX-and CME-implied volatility. Consistent with extant studies our result also shows that the implied volatility provides more information about future volatility-regardless of wheth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with the literature, comparing raw implied volatility forecasts to lagged realized volatility forecasts leads to mixed results (see Andersen, Frederiksen, & Staal, ; Blair, Poon, & Taylor (); Jiang & Tian, ; Martens & Zein, ; Pong, Shackleton, Taylor, & Xu, ). Finally, we find that the historical GJR‐GARCH model underperforms the realized and implied volatility alternatives in almost all cases (similar results are reported by Fleming, ; Jorion, ; Andersen, Bollerslev, Diebold, & Labys, ; Covrig & Low, ; Giot, ; Andersen, Frederiksen, & Staal, ; and Charoenwong, Jenwittayaroje, & Low, , among others).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In line with the literature, comparing raw implied volatility forecasts to lagged realized volatility forecasts leads to mixed results (see Andersen, Frederiksen, & Staal, ; Blair, Poon, & Taylor (); Jiang & Tian, ; Martens & Zein, ; Pong, Shackleton, Taylor, & Xu, ). Finally, we find that the historical GJR‐GARCH model underperforms the realized and implied volatility alternatives in almost all cases (similar results are reported by Fleming, ; Jorion, ; Andersen, Bollerslev, Diebold, & Labys, ; Covrig & Low, ; Giot, ; Andersen, Frederiksen, & Staal, ; and Charoenwong, Jenwittayaroje, & Low, , among others).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…They report that, forecasts based on intra day data sometimes outperform option implied forecasts. Finally, Charoenwong et al (2009) assess the predictive power of implied volatility extracted from options traded on different venues namely the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, and the over-the-counter (OTC) market. Their study concludes that, irrespective of the trading venue, implied volatility performs better than time-series forecasts.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The use of 5-minute intraday data appears to have established as a standard for the analysis of currency markets. 3 In fact, Pong et al (2004) and Charoenwong et al (2009) employ an identical estimator as in (4). As proposed in Andersen and Bollerslev (1997), we use log returns, and we dismiss any data between Friday and Sunday 2100 GMT.…”
Section: Static Hedging and Model-free Variance Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early work on the subject includes Scott (1992), who introduces the notion of a volatility risk premium, Jorion (1995) and Bates (1996a). Covrig and Low (2003), Christoffersen and Mazzotta (2005) and Charoenwong, Jenwittayaroje and Low (2009) use OTC options to study the accuracy of implied volatility forecasts. While their evidence is ambiguous as to whether or not implied volatility is a biased predictor of future realized volatility, they agree that implied volatility subsumes the information contained in competing time-series models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation