Who is the reader of Donatus’ Comment on Terence?

Bureau, Bruno; Nicolas, Christian

doi:10.4000/rursus.1222

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Additional File1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…• for the Donatus manuscripts -Laurentianus Pluteus 53.08 and 53.09 -the edition of HyperDonat by Bruno Bureau & Christian Nicolas has been consulted (Bureau, Nicolas, & Ingarao, 2008) and (Pinche, Bureau, & Nicolas, 2016), preserving, nevertheless, the manuscript lectiones/errors;…”

Section: Additional Filementioning

confidence: 99%

CREMMA Medii Aevi: Literary Manuscript Text Recognition in Latin

Clérice¹,

Vlachou-Efstathiou²,

Alix

2023

JOHD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents a novel segmentation and handwritten text recognition dataset for Medieval Latin from the 11th to the 16th century. It connects with Medieval French datasets, as well as earlier Latin datasets, by enforcing common guidelines, bringing 263,000 new characters and now totaling over a million characters for medieval manuscripts in both languages. We provide our own addition to Ariane Pinche’s Old French guidelines to deal with specific Latin cases. We also offer an overview of how we addressed this dataset compilation through the use of pre-existing resources. With a higher abbreviation ratio and a better representation of abbreviating marks, we offer new models that outperform the Old French base model on Latin datasets, improving accuracy by 5% on unknown Latin manuscripts.

show abstract

Section: Additional Filementioning

confidence: 99%