2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who is the ‘Journal Grand Master’? A new ranking based on the Elo rating system

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper we transfer the Elo rating system, which is widely accepted in chess, sports and other disciplines, to rank scientific journals. The advantage of the Elo system is the explicit consideration of the factor time and the history of a journal's ranking performance. Most other rankings that are commonly applied neglect this fact. The Elo ranking methodology can easily be applied to any metric, published on a regular basis, to rank journals. We illustrate the approach using the SNIP indicator… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the selection process of the articles implicitly assumes quality assurance within the selected journals. Notably, this assumption is not undisputed according to Lehmann and Wohlrabe (2017) or Seiler and Wohlrabe (2014).…”
Section: Bibliographic Review and Scientometric Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the selection process of the articles implicitly assumes quality assurance within the selected journals. Notably, this assumption is not undisputed according to Lehmann and Wohlrabe (2017) or Seiler and Wohlrabe (2014).…”
Section: Bibliographic Review and Scientometric Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where K is an attenuation factor, or else, a weight factor. The K factor represents how fast the rating can evolve (Lehmann and Wohlrabe, 2017). The U.S.…”
Section: B Elo Rankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, if a team wins it gets three points, however if there was a draw, leading to penalty kicks, we consider the result a draw.We define long-term success using a novel Elo rating of CP football teams. Elo ratings are commonly used to rank teams in sports(Gásquez and Royuela, 2016;Lehmann and Wohlrabe, 2017). The Elo rating system is a relative skill ranking based on game-by-game outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work applies the Elo method to the ranking of journals [Lehmann and Wohlrabe, 2017], and compare with established solutions such as the Source Normalized Impact per Publication (SNIP). The authors simulate a yearly roundrobin 'competition' between each pair of different journals and consider the outcome of a match between journals a win for whoever has the higher SNIP score at that year, or a tie if the two journals have equal SNIP score.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%