2009 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icme.2009.5202640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who is the expert? Analyzing gaze data to predict expertise level in collaborative applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From gaze data, systems can also infer skill-level differences on certain tasks [14]. Even without knowing the stimulus, some tasks are easy to identify.…”
Section: Activity and Expertisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From gaze data, systems can also infer skill-level differences on certain tasks [14]. Even without knowing the stimulus, some tasks are easy to identify.…”
Section: Activity and Expertisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model Aims and Feature Used [26] Hidden Markov model Use of fixation count, fixation durations to distinguish between expert and novice participants [27] Multi-layer perceptron (MLP)…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latent group problem, one has to learn about the presence or absence of qualitatively distinct groups, and identify the features of the eye movements that are characteristic of these groups. The discussion of latent groups manifesting through eye movements appear in the context of cognitive tasks (Glady, et al, 2013;Hayes, Petrov, & Sederberg, 2011Loesche, Wiley, & Hasselhorn, 2015;Vigneau, Caissie, & Bors, 2006), decision making (Polonio & Coricelli, 2018;Stewart, Gächter, Noguci, & Mullet, 2016), visual search tasks (Crosby & Peterson, 1991), face recognition and exploration (Chuck, Chan, & Hsiao, 2014, 2017Chuck, Crookes, Hayward, Chan, & Hsiao, 2017;Coutrot, Binetti, Harrison, Mareschal, & Johnston, 2016), and various other topics (Hayes & Henderson, 2018;Liu et al, 2009;West, Haake, Rozanski, & Karn, 2006).…”
Section: Discovering Latent Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enables researchers to use supervised techniques to show that some form of eye-tracking data representation can be used to describe the strategy of the observed groups. The representations range from similarity measures based on string edit and sequence methods (Cristino, Mathôt, Theeuwes, & Gilchrist, 2010;Glady, Thibaut, & French, 2013;Kübler, Rothe, Schiefer, Rosenstiel, & Kasneci, 2017;von der Malsburg & Vasishth, 2011), classifying raw eye tracking statistics (Boisvert & Bruce, 2016;Greene et al, 2012;Henderson, Shinkareva, Wang, Luke, & Olejarczyk, 2013;Hild, Voit, Kühnle, & Beyerer, 2018;Kanan, Ray, Bseiso, Hsiao, & Cottrell, 2014), Markov models (Groner & Groner, 1982;Groner, Walder, & Groner, 1984) or hidden Markov models (Coutrot, Hsiao, & Chan, 2018;Haji-Abolhassani, & Clark, 2014;Kit & Sullivan, 2016;Liu et al, 2009). For a review of different approaches to predict a task from eye movements see Boisvert and Bruce (2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%