2018
DOI: 10.1186/s13174-018-0091-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who is really in my social circle?

Abstract: Tie strength allows to classify social relationships and identify different types of them. For instance, social relationships can be classified as persistent and similar based respectively on the regularity with which they occur and the similarity among them. On the other hand, rare and somewhat similar relationships are random and cause noise in a social network, thus hiding the actual structure of the network and preventing an accurate analysis of it. In this article, we propose a method to handle social net… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This effort can allow user classification through data mining techniques to identify candidates' advocates, political bots, and other actors. Finally, regarding community detection, Leão et al [12] point out the challenge of adopting different approaches for community detection, consider additional algorithms to explore temporal aspects or identify overlapping communities, and evaluate filtered networks. Moreover, different alternatives to measure the strength of ties should be investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This effort can allow user classification through data mining techniques to identify candidates' advocates, political bots, and other actors. Finally, regarding community detection, Leão et al [12] point out the challenge of adopting different approaches for community detection, consider additional algorithms to explore temporal aspects or identify overlapping communities, and evaluate filtered networks. Moreover, different alternatives to measure the strength of ties should be investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leão et al [12] propose a method to handle social network data that exploits temporal features to improve the detection of communities by existing algorithms. By removing random relationships, the authors observe that social networks converge to a topology with more pure social relationships and better quality community structures.…”
Section: The Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building on prior work [ 33 , 36 , 47 , 64 , 85 , 93 ], we consider metrics of backbone quality in two categories: topological, which are closely related to network and community structure, and contextual, which refers to phenomenon-specific attributes.…”
Section: Selection and Evaluation Of Network Backbone Extraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In selecting the backbone methods, we consider those that have been proposed for weighted networks and applied to the analysis of collective behavior, often in projected networks [ 21 23 , 31 , 33 , 35 , 56 , 64 , 76 , 77 , 79 , 83 , 84 ]. We consider methods that have been explored by prior studies, restricting our focus to those applied in social media applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the simplest methods of backbone extraction explore topological metrics and global properties of the graph. They typically propose to select the most important edges for the study [65,59,58,56,61]. Examples include the use of Kcore searches for dense subgraphs [66,67] and the removal of edges based on a global threshold τ, either applied directly to edge weights [68,69,70] or to more sophisticated metrics such as the neighborhood overlap of a pair of nodes [71,72].…”
Section: Network Backbone Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%