2015
DOI: 10.14267/cjssp.2015.01.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who is populist in Central and Eastern Europe? Comparative analysis of prime ministers' populist disclosure

Abstract: This article measures populist discourse among prime ministers in new Central and Eastern European democracies using holistic grading as a specific type of textual analysis. The article first offers a definition of populism and then measures political discourse by grading political speeches of contemporary prime ministers in Central and Eastern Europe. Next, it presents descriptive data about prime ministers' political discourse and discusses positive cases of populism in reference to democratic structures. De… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The emerging academic research on populism has contributed to a general consensus that populism should be best understood as a set of ideas which are being articulated through the discourse of political actors (DeeganKrause & Haughton, 2009;Kocijan, 2015;Hawkins & Kaltwasser, 2017). Therefore, it is now widely accepted among scholars that intersections.…”
Section: Populism As Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The emerging academic research on populism has contributed to a general consensus that populism should be best understood as a set of ideas which are being articulated through the discourse of political actors (DeeganKrause & Haughton, 2009;Kocijan, 2015;Hawkins & Kaltwasser, 2017). Therefore, it is now widely accepted among scholars that intersections.…”
Section: Populism As Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the ideational definition, populism as discourse should demonstrate three core features: a) Manichean and often moral understanding of politics; b) the proclamation of 'the people' as a homogenous and virtuous community; and c) the depiction of 'the elite' or 'the establishment' as a corrupt and selfserving entity (Hawkins et al, 2018). The approach to populism as a specific type of discourse has already yielded advanced research in the field, mainly in crossregional studies through textual analysis, survey research and experiments (Kocijan, 2015;Grbeša & Šalaj, 2018;Jenne et al, 2021). One of Hawkins' (2009;2010) most significant contributions has been the development of a complex coding rubric for the measurement of various levels of populism through a textual analysis, which he has applied to Latin American cases, mainly by analysing party manifestos and speeches.…”
Section: Populism As Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Orban's first term (1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002) was not populist, while his return to office (2010-14 and 2014-18) shows higher means. Erdogan's and Orban's increases could be explained by the emergence of contextual facilitators of populism during their terms in office, which would lead the two to adopt this kind of discourse (Kocijan 2015).…”
Section: A Picture Of Populism Around the Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%