2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who gets lost and why: A representative cross-sectional survey on sociodemographic and vestibular determinants of wayfinding strategies

Abstract: When we think of our family and friends, we probably know someone who is good at finding their way and someone else that easily gets lost. We still know little about the biological and environmental factors that influence our navigational ability. Here, we investigated the frequency and sociodemographic determinants of wayfinding and their association with vestibular function in a representative cross-sectional sample (N = 783) of the adult German-speaking population. Wayfinding was assessed using the Wayfindi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the formal educational level should be viewed as a proxy of general cognitive abilities (see Elias, M.F. et al 1997, or Le Carret, N. et al 2003, spatial abilities (Proust-Lima, C. et al 2008;Ulrich, S. et al 2019), and an intention to gain new (technical) skills. Arning, K. et al (2012) argue that smart navigation technology acceptance is affected by the level of individual technical self-efficacy (TSE), defined as the confidence in one's own ability to solve technical problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, the formal educational level should be viewed as a proxy of general cognitive abilities (see Elias, M.F. et al 1997, or Le Carret, N. et al 2003, spatial abilities (Proust-Lima, C. et al 2008;Ulrich, S. et al 2019), and an intention to gain new (technical) skills. Arning, K. et al (2012) argue that smart navigation technology acceptance is affected by the level of individual technical self-efficacy (TSE), defined as the confidence in one's own ability to solve technical problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…et al 2012). Less educated people show lower orientation scores (Ulrich, S. et al 2019) and are likely to follow a route strategy, while empirical evidence for the latter is missing. To sum up, we expect that the acceptance of smart navigation apps will differ among par-ticular hospital pavilions and departments, depending on the perceived difficulties of finding these places.…”
Section: Gender Age Education and Their Effects On Technology Acceptancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that their ability to make and use cognitive environment maps is limited. The results suggest that allocentric navigation strategies, in which cognitive maps are used, deteriorate in increasing age [16]. Correspondingly, Rodgers et al [19] argue that the elderly rely dominantly on the egocentric navigational strategy, while younger individuals use both strategies roughly equally.…”
Section: Agementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Respondents were asked about their perception of the current hospital navigational system and preferences of various cues, focusing on their willingness to use a smart navigation application. We aim to contribute to the existing literature concerning wayfinding in hospitals by linking two different streams of research are linked: (i) theoretical studies focusing on explanation of age-, gender-, or education-based differences in wayfinding [8,[14][15][16][17][18][19], and (ii) applied research dealing with the navigational systems in hospitals from the technology and/or management point of view [4,20,21]. Our aim is to provide specific recommendations for the design of hospital navigation systems that will be based on theoretical understanding and empirical identification of hospital patients'/visitors' navigational needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the enduring human activities is wayfinding, since most of the daily activities involve people moving between different, occasionally unknown, locations. Although wayfinding depends on external issues such as the effective delivery of maps and signs (Calori, 2007), it is also an ability depending on sociodemographic factors such as education, gender and age (Ulrich et al, 2019). The prevalent use of smart phones and the technological progress on Augmented Reality (AR) has much to offer in terms of easing the process of wayfinding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%