2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who eats What: Unravelling a complex taphonomic scenario in the lacustrine deposits of the late Pleistocene archaeological site, Taguatagua 1, central Chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, if the gomphothere remains are also considered, the mammalian record of TT-1 is comparatively more diverse. In addition, the anthropogenic imprint on the small vertebrate assemblage seems to be more important at TT-1 than at TT-3 [ 34 ]. Gomphothere skull portions as well as mandibles and pelvises were recorded at TT-1 [ 33 ], indicating that the primary butchering process was carried out around these anatomical units.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, if the gomphothere remains are also considered, the mammalian record of TT-1 is comparatively more diverse. In addition, the anthropogenic imprint on the small vertebrate assemblage seems to be more important at TT-1 than at TT-3 [ 34 ]. Gomphothere skull portions as well as mandibles and pelvises were recorded at TT-1 [ 33 ], indicating that the primary butchering process was carried out around these anatomical units.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TT-1 has recently been re-dated to ca. 12,600 cal yr BP [33] and was interpreted as a small residential camp where megamammal and small vertebrate processing and consumption occurred [33][34][35]. TT-2, with dates between *11,600-11,300 cal yr BP [32], is interpreted as an intensive gomphothere hunting/butchering site [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%