2020
DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who Deserves Welfare and Who Does Not? Comment on "A Scoping Review of Populist Radical Right Parties’ Influence on Welfare Policy and its Implications for Population Health in Europe"

Abstract: To what extent has the rise of populist radical right (PRR) parties in Europe affected welfare policies? Based on a scoping review of studies that address the relationship between PRR parties and welfare policy, Chiara Rinaldi and Marleen Bekker conclude that, due to their welfare chauvinistic positions, the participation of PRR parties in government coalitions is likely to have negative effects on the access to welfare provisions and health of vulnerable population groups. This short commentary reflects on th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the excellent contributions in the 11 commentaries to our scoping review, we reconstruct the different meanings and manifestations of the PRR as described in the original paper. Although we acknowledge that there are limitations to our research design, such as the use of welfare policies as a proxy for population health, 3 we will use this correspondence as an opportunity to go beyond this particular study to suggest a number of avenues for future research.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the excellent contributions in the 11 commentaries to our scoping review, we reconstruct the different meanings and manifestations of the PRR as described in the original paper. Although we acknowledge that there are limitations to our research design, such as the use of welfare policies as a proxy for population health, 3 we will use this correspondence as an opportunity to go beyond this particular study to suggest a number of avenues for future research.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%