2016
DOI: 10.1111/1477-8947.12095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who counts, what counts: representation and accountability in water governance in the Upper Comoé sub‐basin, Burkina Faso

Abstract: This article examines the unfolding of integrated water resource management (IWRM)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(113 reference statements)
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In SSA, attempts to bring this new mode of water governance into practice have been made in Burkina Faso, Tanzania, Kenya, South Africa and Zimbabwe (Kemerink et al 2016;Komakech and van der Zaag 2013;Manzungu 2002;Roncoli et al 2016). The creation of water user platforms is usually introduced through a reform in the national law.…”
Section: Its Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In SSA, attempts to bring this new mode of water governance into practice have been made in Burkina Faso, Tanzania, Kenya, South Africa and Zimbabwe (Kemerink et al 2016;Komakech and van der Zaag 2013;Manzungu 2002;Roncoli et al 2016). The creation of water user platforms is usually introduced through a reform in the national law.…”
Section: Its Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, prescriptions on the organizational forms may differ from country to country. In Burkina Faso, water policy reforms prescribe the establishment of local water committees with voluntary membership and an advisory role to the government (Roncoli et al 2016). In Tanzania, the water law provides for catchment and sub-catchment committees that can be delegated functions by the river basin authority (Komakech and van der Zaag 2013).…”
Section: Its Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations