1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02943792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who best assesses Crohn’s disease?

Abstract: Both clinicians gave the same rating of activity in 81% (157) of assessments. A good relationship was observed between the median indical values and the clinical gradings for all four indices. The best relationship was demonstrated with the AI with no overlap in 50% values with increasing grades of disease activity. All four indices demonstrated a good correlation with each other (p < 0.01). The best correlation was observed between more objective indices the AI and the Fielding index (r = 0.79) for first asse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
references
References 7 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance