2016
DOI: 10.1080/16081625.2016.1151364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who benefits from political connections? Minority investors or controlling shareholders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This condition depicts the negative entrenchment effects, which hamper the wealth of minority shareholders. If the controlling shareholders are politically motivated instead of considering firm value maximization, then they can expropriate the wealth of minority shareholders (Wang and Lin, 2017). The results of our study are consistent with those from the study of Morck et al (1988), who argued the negative relationship between concentrated ownership and market value.…”
Section: Regression Analysissupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This condition depicts the negative entrenchment effects, which hamper the wealth of minority shareholders. If the controlling shareholders are politically motivated instead of considering firm value maximization, then they can expropriate the wealth of minority shareholders (Wang and Lin, 2017). The results of our study are consistent with those from the study of Morck et al (1988), who argued the negative relationship between concentrated ownership and market value.…”
Section: Regression Analysissupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Johnson et al (2000) argue that it is not uncommon for the controlling shareholders to transfer firms' resources, a practice which they term "tunnelling", for the purpose of expropriating minority shareholders. Subsequent research has examined the various mechanisms through which controlling shareholders can extract resources from minority shareholders, for example, through related-party transactions (Berkman et al, 2010), relatedparty loan guarantee (Huang, 2016), or appointing politically connected independent directors (Wang and Lin, 2017).…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we assess the implications of RPTs in a different corporate governance context. Prior studies present evidence from contexts with widely dispersed shareholding and strong investor protection (Aguilera et al, 2006;El-Helaly, 2016;Ahmed and Mather, 2016) and higher government shareholding (Wang and Lin, 2017;Jian and Wong, 2010). Among East Asian countries, corporate governance practices, ownership structure and investor protection tend to exhibit similar characteristics (Lemmon and Lins, 2003;Aswadi Abdul Wahab et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%