Who benefits from benefits? Empirical research on tangible incentives

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. www.econstor.eu The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. Terms of use: Documents in D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E SIZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author.IZA Discussion Paper No. 6284 January 2012 ABSTRACT Who Benefits from Benefits? Empirical Research on Tangible IncentivesAlthough a broad field of literature on incentive theory exists, employer-provided tangible goods (hereafter called benefits) have so far been neglected by economic research. A remarkable exception is an empirical study by Oyer (2008). In our study, we test some of his findings by drawing on a German data set. We use two waves of the GSOEP data (2006, 2008) to analyze the occurrence of benefits and their effects on employees' satisfaction. Our results provide evidence for economic as well as psychological explanations. Looking at differences in firms' and employees' characteristics we find that cost efficiency concerns, the purpose to signal good working conditions and the aim to ease employees' effort costs are evident reasons to provide benefits. Furthermore, analyzing the impact of tangible and monetary incentives on satisfaction and employees' feeling of being acknowledged by employers, we find different motivational effects. Our results support the psychological explanation that benefits are evaluated separately from other monetary wage components and are more likely to express employers' concern for their employees and recognition of their performance. JEL Classification:C83, J32, M52

Cash, non-cash, or mix? Gender matters! The impact of monetary, non-monetary, and mixed incentives on performance

“…As individuals strive for social esteem and recognition (Bandura 1986;Ellingsen and Johannesson 2007;Stajkovic and Luthans 2003), the value of earning a tangible incentive is enhanced (Jeffrey and Shaffer 2007). Rewarding employees for good performance and showing respect and appreciation by means of non-monetary incentives may thus have a positive effect on employees' effort choices (Ellingsen and Johannesson 2007;Hammermann and Mohnen 2014b;Kube et al 2012). Therefore, we suggest that non-monetary incentives may lead to higher performance compared to monetary incentives.…”

“…As outlined in Sect. 3.1. non-monetary incentives can address employees' need for acknowledgement (Ellingsen and Johannesson 2007;Hammermann and Mohnen 2014b;Kube et al 2012). However, the most appropriate type of incentive to reward and acknowledge employees might differ between men and women.…”

Requirements of University Students of Agricultural Focus on Employee Benefits

“…This benefit is more likely to be provided to the employees on managerial positions, particularly top management (Hammermann, 2014).…”

Awards: A strategic management perspective

“…Designing and implementing an award program that helps a firm obtain long‐lasting competitive advantage is difficult. As the survey by Jeffrey, Dickinson, and Einarsson () on the use of reward and recognition awards shows, managers using awards so far cannot base their decisions on high‐quality information (see also Hammermann and Mohnen, : 327). A number of human resource experts claim that “most recognition programs reward the wrong things” (Weber, ).…”