Who Benefits and Who Loses from Climate Change?

Tol, Richard S.J.

doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6431-0_58-1

Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation 2015

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6431-0_58-1

|View full text |Cite

Who Benefits and Who Loses from Climate Change?

Richard S.J. Tol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2016

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(a) Damage curve. Constrained (no constant) quadratic fit to the 21 currently available data points, as garnered by Tol (2015). Damage expressed as percentage of global GNP.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Whither climate change post-Paris?

Thompson

2016

The Anthropocene Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Paris Climate Agreement has been welcomed by many as providing a remarkably strong basis for global action on anthropogenically mediated climate change, by underpinning a highly ambitious, very clever and forward-looking political process. On the other hand, the sum total of the fresh emission reductions pledged is very small. A new climate-economics model is explored to help focus on two key points remaining at issue post-Paris, namely where are we now and where are we headed? The output reinforces the unpalatable finding that in the absence of even stronger carbon-pricing policies, temperatures and sea-level will, this century, rise significantly beyond what are currently deemed to be ‘dangerous’ levels. Pigouvian taxes have long been championed by economists as providing a simple, down-to-earth corrective remedy for market failures, such as excessive carbon emissions. The Wilsonian modification, or ‘feebate’, provides an attractive modern variant that could easily be implemented post-Paris.

show abstract

“…(a) Damage curve. Constrained (no constant) quadratic fit to the 21 currently available data points, as garnered by Tol (2015). Damage expressed as percentage of global GNP.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Whither climate change post-Paris?

Thompson

2016

The Anthropocene Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Estimation of Climate Change Damage Functions for 140 Regions in the GTAP 9 Database

Roson

Sartori

2016

JGEA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Who Benefits and Who Loses from Climate Change?

Cited by 2 publications

References 57 publications

Whither climate change post-Paris?

Whither climate change post-Paris?

Estimation of Climate Change Damage Functions for 140 Regions in the GTAP 9 Database

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About