2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12998-022-00440-6
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who are the chiropractic students favouring a limitless scope of practice? Exploring the relationship with personality, magical thinking, and academic achievement

Abstract: Introduction Some chiropractors seem to have an inflated belief in the powers of spinal manipulation (SMT), for example aiming at preventing future spinal degeneration and health problems, activities that are without supporting evidence. Non-evidenced health beliefs have been shown to be associated with a tendency toward magical thinking. Holding such beliefs about SMT is associated with a limitless scope of practice (LLSoP). Recent studies have shown that “chiropractic conservatism” (ChiroCon)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While it is difficult to know the global extent of all prompting and refuting messaging outside of Twitter, we also note that announcements from chiropractic organizations that promoted the idea of chiropractic/SMT improving immunity also came primarily from the United States. Explanations for this geographic separation are not readily available, but possible avenues of future investigation may include comparing the proportion of senior versus early career chiropractors in various countries and the location of chiropractic schools that emphasize conservative or dogmatic chiropractic views [31]. It is important to emphasize that it is not possible to confirm the occupation or affiliation of those who author tweets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is difficult to know the global extent of all prompting and refuting messaging outside of Twitter, we also note that announcements from chiropractic organizations that promoted the idea of chiropractic/SMT improving immunity also came primarily from the United States. Explanations for this geographic separation are not readily available, but possible avenues of future investigation may include comparing the proportion of senior versus early career chiropractors in various countries and the location of chiropractic schools that emphasize conservative or dogmatic chiropractic views [31]. It is important to emphasize that it is not possible to confirm the occupation or affiliation of those who author tweets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Innes S, Goncalves G, Leboeuf-Yde C. Who are the chiropractic students favouring a limitless scope of practice? Exploring the relation-ship with personality, magical thinking, and academic achievement [ 9 ]. Cross-sectional survey of chiropractic students The aim of our study was to explore whether there are any factors that help explain the adoption of views on chiropractic conservatism (ChiroCon) in an evidence-based chiropractic education environment and its association with an increased likelihood of using SMT for conditions without an evidence-base (e.g., non-MSK).…”
Section: Which Topics Were Addressed?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The randomized clinical trial from Bronfort et al [ 8 ] included in this series provides one example comparing different models for delivering conservative care (unimodal versus integrated care) and including outcomes such as pain coping strategies and self-efficacy to examine outcomes related to the development of self-management skills in the participants. Finally, Innes and colleagues [ 9 ] examine the attitudes and beliefs of students in chiropractic education programs around the perceived mechanisms of structural interventions and professional identity.…”
Section: Which Topics Were Addressed?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following the publication of the original article [1], it has been brought to our attention that several of the provided references are mismatched in the Background section and are incorrectly recorded in the Reference section.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%