2017
DOI: 10.1112/plms.12006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whitney extension theorems for convex functions of the classes C1 and C1,ω

Abstract: Let C be a subset of R n (not necessarily convex), f : C → R be a function and G : C → R n be a uniformly continuous function, with modulus of continuity ω. We provide a necessary and sufficient condition on f , G for the existence of a convex function F ∈ C 1,ω (R n ) such that F = f on C and ∇F = G on C, with a good control of the modulus of continuity of ∇F in terms of that of G. On the other hand, assuming that C is compact, we also solve a similar problem for the class of C 1 convex functions on R n , wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus one could say that, up to an additive linear perturbation and a composition with a linear projection onto a subspace of possibly smaller dimension, every convex function on R n is essentially coercive. This decomposition property has been useful in the proofs of several recent results on global smooth approximation and extension by convex functions; see [1,4,5,2,3].…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus one could say that, up to an additive linear perturbation and a composition with a linear projection onto a subspace of possibly smaller dimension, every convex function on R n is essentially coercive. This decomposition property has been useful in the proofs of several recent results on global smooth approximation and extension by convex functions; see [1,4,5,2,3].…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recently, a related problem has been solved for convex functions of the classes C 1 (R n ) and C 1,ω (X) (for a Hilbert space X) in the situation where the mapping G is single-valued and one additionally requires that the extension F be of class C 1 (R n ) (which amounts to asking that ∂F (x) be a singleton for every x ∈ R n ) or of class C 1,ω (X); see [1,2,3]. A solution to a similar problem for general (not necessarily convex) functions was given in [11,Theorem 5], characterizing the pairs f : E → R, G : E ⇒ R n with f continuous and G upper semicontinuous and nonempty, compact and convexvalued which admit a (generally nonconvex) extension F of f whose Fréchet subdifferential is upper semicontinuous on R n and extends G from E.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given C a differentiability class in R n , E a subset of R n , and functions f : E → R and G : E → R n , how can we decide whether there is a convex function F ∈ C such that F (x) = f (x) and ∇F (x) = G(x) for all x ∈ E? This is a natural question which we could solve in [5] in the case that C = C 1,ω (R n ), where ω : [0, ∞) → [0, ∞) is a (strictly increasing and concave) modulus of continuity. A necessary and sufficient condition is that there exists a constant M > 0 such that…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let C 1 conv (R n ) stand for the set of all functions f : R n → R which are convex and of class C 1 . In [5], and for the class C = C 1 (R n ), we could only obtain a solution to Problem 1.1 in the particular case that E is a compact set. In this special situation the three necessary and sufficient conditions on (f, G) that we obtained for C 1 conv (R n ) extendibility are: (which tells us that if two points of the graph of f lie on a line segment contained in a hyperplane which we want to be tangent to the graph of an extension at one of the points, then our putative tangent hyperplanes at both points must be the same).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%