The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1504/ijpee.2017.10006435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whither economic complexity? A new heterodox economic paradigm or just another variation within the mainstream?

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The outcome is an unstable, sub-optimally performing economy that may not necessarily collapse in the end. Say's and Walras' laws are refuted within this framework, as argued by Heise (2019). In this understanding of capitalism, markets serve as allocative mechanisms, while social conflict primarily influences personal income distribution rather than functional income distribution.…”
Section: Social Conflict Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome is an unstable, sub-optimally performing economy that may not necessarily collapse in the end. Say's and Walras' laws are refuted within this framework, as argued by Heise (2019). In this understanding of capitalism, markets serve as allocative mechanisms, while social conflict primarily influences personal income distribution rather than functional income distribution.…”
Section: Social Conflict Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of warning had, however, an outspoken methodological character at the outset (a certain revival of the old term Methodenstreit, see e. g. in Louzek 2011). Csaba and other authors (Fine -Milonakis 2009;Klaes 2012;Kurtakko 2014;Heise 2017) were concerned about the growing dominance of quantitative approach and thinking in economics as opposed to a more balanced approach including qualitative elements. The economic counterpart of "vulgar mathematics", where mathematical symbols without any potential data content were applied, was also commented (Török -Nagy 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%