2017
DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.13514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

White‐tailed Deer as a Taphonomic Agent: Photographic Evidence of White‐tailed Deer Gnawing on Human Bone

Abstract: Ungulate gnawing on bone has been reported in the taphonomic and zooarchaeological literature, but there are no known reports of ungulates altering human remains. Herein, we report on the first known photographic evidence of deer gnawing human remains. As described in nonhuman scavenging literature, forking of the bone characterizes the taphonomic effect of deer gnawing in this case, which is distinct from the effect caused by other scavengers. This type of osteophagia during the winter season is consistent wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not observe cervids contacting carrion, yet foraging in the vicinity also poses a risk because prions can be dispersed and infectious for ≥2 years (Miller et al 2004). For instance, cervids sometimes gnaw on bones (Sutcliffe 1973, Gambín et al 2017, Meckel et al 2018) and the decomposition of carrion adds nutrients to the soil, causing a subsequent flush of high‐quality forage that may lure herbivores (Towne 2000). The abundance of cervids at kill sites highlights the risks of improper carcass disposal or transporting carcasses from areas of high disease prevalence (Osterholm et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not observe cervids contacting carrion, yet foraging in the vicinity also poses a risk because prions can be dispersed and infectious for ≥2 years (Miller et al 2004). For instance, cervids sometimes gnaw on bones (Sutcliffe 1973, Gambín et al 2017, Meckel et al 2018) and the decomposition of carrion adds nutrients to the soil, causing a subsequent flush of high‐quality forage that may lure herbivores (Towne 2000). The abundance of cervids at kill sites highlights the risks of improper carcass disposal or transporting carcasses from areas of high disease prevalence (Osterholm et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the inter-species transmission of Sarcoptes mites arises through both direct or indirect contact [8], there are two likely explanations for the transmission from Caniformia populations to the serow populations: (i) the direct transmission upon touching the carcasses of mangy animals; and (ii) indirect transmission through the sharing of habitat intensively used by both mammal populations. For the direct contact, the probable reason is the exploring or foraging behavior for dead animals sometimes observed in ruminant species such as cattle [50] and deer [51]. There is no observation, but likelihood that serows behave similar to dead or debilitated mangy Caniformia animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on invertebrate scavengers (insects) have been performed globally, including in Canada [13,[27][28][29], but only recently in the province of Quebec [17]. While the global literature reports the scavenging activity of mammalian species (e.g., coyote, domestic dog, bear, raccoon, rodents) [2,8,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37], as well as avian species (e.g., vultures, crows, and other bird species) [4][5][6]24,38], only a limited number of these published studies have been carried out in Canada [23,39], and to date, none in the province of Quebec.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%