2012
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbs054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

White Matter Development in Adolescence: Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Meta-Analytic Results

Abstract: These data highlight increasing connectivity in the SLF during adolescence. In light of evidence for compromised SLF integrity in high-risk and first-episode patients, these data suggest that abnormal maturation of the SLF during adolescence may be a key target in the neurodevelopment of schizophrenia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
149
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
15
149
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together, genetic vulnerability for schizophrenia may result in frontostriatal neurodevelopmental changes already before adolescence and this may evolve into decreased mean FA during adulthood. In contrast to decreasing FA measures in schizophrenia offspring, our finding of an increase in mean FA in the tracts connecting the nucleus accumbens and DLPFC with progressing age in typical developing control adolescents is consistent with previous DTI studies (Giorgio et al, 2008;Lebel et al, 2008;Peper et al, 2013;Peters et al, 2012). As FA may be used as an index for the microstructural directionality of white matter fiber bundles (Basser and Pierpaoli, 1996), our finding of increasing FA across age in control adolescents may reflect maturation of white matter tracts across adolescence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Taken together, genetic vulnerability for schizophrenia may result in frontostriatal neurodevelopmental changes already before adolescence and this may evolve into decreased mean FA during adulthood. In contrast to decreasing FA measures in schizophrenia offspring, our finding of an increase in mean FA in the tracts connecting the nucleus accumbens and DLPFC with progressing age in typical developing control adolescents is consistent with previous DTI studies (Giorgio et al, 2008;Lebel et al, 2008;Peper et al, 2013;Peters et al, 2012). As FA may be used as an index for the microstructural directionality of white matter fiber bundles (Basser and Pierpaoli, 1996), our finding of increasing FA across age in control adolescents may reflect maturation of white matter tracts across adolescence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Such a finding lends evidence to support the hypothesis that those with ADHD may engage in adaptive processing strategies to compensate for impairments in other brain regions. 64 Furthermore, our results are in line with those of studies in healthy participants that demonstrate the importance of the SLF, especially the right side, in attention performance 29 and working memory, 30 which are considered to be major neuropsychological deficits in individuals with ADHD. 65 In addition, our findings raised a noteworthy issue: most studies reported correlations between the frontostriatal tracts and ADHD symptoms without considering the effects of other related white matter tracts.…”
Section: Correlations Between the Slf And Adhd Symptoms And Attentionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…27 The superior parietal lobule participates in the transmission of spatial information for body parts, the caudal part of the inferior parietal lobule is responsible for visual attention, and the inferior parietal lobule plays a role in working memory. 28 The superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) as well as the interconnecting frontal, parietal and temporal cortices are involved in attention performance 29 and working memory 30 in control children. Alteration in the SLF has been demonstrated in children [31][32][33] and adults 34,35 with ADHD.…”
Section: J Psychiatry Neurosci 2015;40(5)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suggest several possible reasons for the reported discrepancies: (1) in OCD, white matter alterations might be subtle thus difficult to detect; (2) medication effects seem to confound the findings (Yoo et al, 2007;Fan et al, 2012;Benedetti et al, 2013;Radua et al, 2014); (3) results are highly variable across pediatric, adolescent and adult patients due to changes in white matter architecture throughout brain development (Peters et al, 2012); (4) debate has risen recently on whether FA alone is sufficient and sufficiently representative to indicate changes in white matter microstructure (Hasan, 2006;Fan et al, 2012;Szczepankiewicz et al, 2014); and (5) small samples and inconsistent methodologies have been used (Radua et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%