White Boys Drink, Black Girls Yell...:  A Racialized and Gendered Analysis of Violent Hazing and the Law

Parks, Gregory Scott; Jones, Shayne; Ray, Rashawn; Hughey, Matthew W.; Cox, Jonathan M.

doi:10.2139/ssrn.3004714

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 22 publications

(23 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Studies have documented activities that cause physical and psychological harm, entail high-risk substance abuse, and involve sexual and gender violence (Allan et al, 2019; Finkel, 2002; Hoover, 1999), which tend to reinforce heteronormativity regardless of race, ethnicity, or gender identity (Anderson et al, 2012; Parks et al, 2015).…”

Section: Nature and Extent Of College Hazingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing Readiness for Campus Hazing Prevention

Swan

Allan

2022

Health Educ Behav

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This case study examined community readiness in a cohort of U.S. universities. Drawing on the Community Readiness Model (CRM), the extent to which a campus was ready to implement a comprehensive hazing prevention plan was assessed. The study was designed to help build the knowledge base using the CRM to systematically assess the cohort’s work to prevent hazing. Methods. Utilizing the CRM, key informants were interviewed. Interview data were scored using CRM rating scales and then coded following basic interpretive methods of qualitative analysis. Scores determined levels of readiness while data were analyzed for emergent themes related to a comprehensive approach to hazing prevention. Results. The CRM assessment revealed preplanning stages of readiness, meaning campus staff considered hazing prevention to be important and asking what should be done. Emergent themes that may strengthen and sustain hazing prevention in higher education are identified and discussed. Conclusions. Indications that the CRM may be useful for hazing prevention research and practice can contribute to the development of a knowledge base to support efficacy and assist campus communities in focusing their work while directing efforts toward higher levels of readiness.

show abstract

Section: Nature and Extent Of College Hazingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing Readiness for Campus Hazing Prevention

Swan

Allan

2022

Health Educ Behav

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Media reports and researchers have reported a wide range of hazing behaviors, including activities that cause physical and psychological harm, involve high-risk substance abuse, and sexual violence (Finkel, 2002;Finley & Finley, 2007;Flanagan, 2017;Hoover & Pollard, 1999;Kirby & Wintrup, 2002). Further, with increasing recognition of how socio-cultural forces and identity may shape hazing experiences and perceptions of it, researchers have also explored questions related to gender, race, and sexuality in relation to hazing (e.g., Allan & Kinney, 2018;Jones, 2004;Parks & Laybourn, 2017;Parks et al, 2015;Rogers et al, 2012;Veliz-Calderon & Allan, 2017).…”

Section: Relevant Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Teaching student leadership, ethics, and group responsibility for hazing prevention: An exploratory study.

Malaret¹,

Allen²,

Graham³

et al. 2021

JCAPS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hazing is generally defined as any activity expected of someone joining or participating in a group that humiliates, degrades, abuses, or endangers them regardless of a person’s willingness to participate (Hoover, 1999) and has been documented among college students in groups ranging from athletics to marching bands to fraternities and sororities (Allen & Madden, 2008). This investigation examined attitudes and perceptions about hazing for students in a leadership development program compared to their peers. Both groups participated in an online hazing prevention education module and completed pre- and post-surveys. Data were analyzed using statistical two-tailed t-tests for analysis. Though the literature on hazing is highly suggestive of linkages between leadership development and hazing mitigation, it appears this may not be the case. Findings from this investigation revealed that leadership students at this institution responded less strongly against hazing when compared with their peers in the general student body.

show abstract