2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-8062-5_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

White Blood Cell Segmentation and Classification Using Deep Learning Coupled with Image Processing Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Information could travel through the encoder portion without having to be transformed into features. This means that the CNN model could use the information in the features of the shallower regions as well as the knowledge it learned through being compelled to construct features in the deep part [46]. Figure 5 illustrates an example UNet structure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information could travel through the encoder portion without having to be transformed into features. This means that the CNN model could use the information in the features of the shallower regions as well as the knowledge it learned through being compelled to construct features in the deep part [46]. Figure 5 illustrates an example UNet structure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest sensitivity of 99.4 % [7] was obtained where the method of TissueQuant was used to manage color alterations for the nuclei detection. The highest mean accuracy of 99.4 % [8] was obtained, using Thresholding method and Watershed algorithm. Color-based segmentation with active contour model.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The proposed WBC segmentation approach by Hieu Trung Huynh et al [8], was an aggregation of Watershed algorithm and thresholding method. The WBCs or leukocyte types were labelled by a deep neural network-based model where the considered viewpoint reached the accuracy of mean classification for 5-class WBCs nucleus is 99.40 %, the least achieved accuracy for Monocytes is 98.60 % while the highest accuracy achieved for eosinophil is 99.80 % and 99.4 %, 99.6 %, and 99.2 % respectively for neutrophil, basophil, and lymphocyte.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation