White blood cell count to mean platelet volume ratio as a novel non-invasive marker predicting long-term outcomes in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome
Abstract:(p < 0.001). In an adjusted cox regression model, the elevated WMR was independently predicted the incidence of MACE (hazard ratio 2.419, p < 0.001).
Conclusions:The elevated baseline WMR independently predicted the MACE incidence in patients with NSTE-ACS during long-term follow-up. (Cardiol J 2015; 22, 4: 437-445) Key words: white blood cell to mean platelet volume ratio, non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome, major adverse cardiovascular events
“…Increased WBCs may appear as a significant factor showing impaired microvascular reperfusion. Recently, Dehghani et al [11] investigated a novel parameter called WMR as a marker predicting long-term outcomes in patients with NSTEMI. They suggested that WMR is a better predictor of worse outcomes in patients with NSTEMI than WBC and MPV [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Dehghani et al [11] investigated a novel parameter called WMR as a marker predicting long-term outcomes in patients with NSTEMI. They suggested that WMR is a better predictor of worse outcomes in patients with NSTEMI than WBC and MPV [11]. In light of these evidences, we decided to evaluate the prognostic value of WMR with a large number of patients with STEMI undergoing pPCI and demonstrated that WMR is a better indicator of predicting the poor outcomes in STEMI than MPV, RDW, PLR-NLR and WBC-MPV combinations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from WBC count, other blood count parameters such as neutrophil count, red blood cell distribution with (RDW), mean platelet volume (MPV), high neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and high platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) also seem to have prognostic value in STEMI [6][7][8][9][10]. As a combination of both WBC and mean platelet volume, WBC count to mean platelet volume ratio (WMR) has been recently found as a novel non-invasive marker predicting long-term outcomes in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) [11]. Until now, the use of this marker for cardiovascular (CV) prognosis has not been investigated in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) for STEMI.…”
Background: Increased white blood cell (WBC) count is associated with increased mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI
Results: WMR has the highest area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and pairwise comparisons of the ROC curves revealed that WMR has the higher discriminative ability for long-term mortality than WBC, MPV, red blood cell distribution with (RDW), WBC-MPV combination, and platelet to lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (PLR-NLR) combination in patients undergoing PLR-NLR and WBC-MPV combinations. (Cardiol J 2016; 23, 3: 225-235) Key words: mean platelet volume, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, white blood cell Introductıon
“…Increased WBCs may appear as a significant factor showing impaired microvascular reperfusion. Recently, Dehghani et al [11] investigated a novel parameter called WMR as a marker predicting long-term outcomes in patients with NSTEMI. They suggested that WMR is a better predictor of worse outcomes in patients with NSTEMI than WBC and MPV [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Dehghani et al [11] investigated a novel parameter called WMR as a marker predicting long-term outcomes in patients with NSTEMI. They suggested that WMR is a better predictor of worse outcomes in patients with NSTEMI than WBC and MPV [11]. In light of these evidences, we decided to evaluate the prognostic value of WMR with a large number of patients with STEMI undergoing pPCI and demonstrated that WMR is a better indicator of predicting the poor outcomes in STEMI than MPV, RDW, PLR-NLR and WBC-MPV combinations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from WBC count, other blood count parameters such as neutrophil count, red blood cell distribution with (RDW), mean platelet volume (MPV), high neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and high platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) also seem to have prognostic value in STEMI [6][7][8][9][10]. As a combination of both WBC and mean platelet volume, WBC count to mean platelet volume ratio (WMR) has been recently found as a novel non-invasive marker predicting long-term outcomes in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) [11]. Until now, the use of this marker for cardiovascular (CV) prognosis has not been investigated in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) for STEMI.…”
Background: Increased white blood cell (WBC) count is associated with increased mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI
Results: WMR has the highest area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and pairwise comparisons of the ROC curves revealed that WMR has the higher discriminative ability for long-term mortality than WBC, MPV, red blood cell distribution with (RDW), WBC-MPV combination, and platelet to lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (PLR-NLR) combination in patients undergoing PLR-NLR and WBC-MPV combinations. (Cardiol J 2016; 23, 3: 225-235) Key words: mean platelet volume, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, white blood cell Introductıon
“…We have read the article entitled "White blood cell count to mean platelet volume ratio as a novel non-invasive marker predicting long-term outcomes in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome" [1] with great interest. Both leukocytes and platelets have been reported to be involved in several cardiovascular (CV) diseases through inflammatory pathways.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The close relationship between inflammation, aggregation, and atherosclerosis progression has become a field of intensive research. The study by Dehghani et al [1] evaluated the predictive role of white blood cell count/mean platelet volume (WBC/MPV) ratio (WMR) in long-term outcomes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. However, we have some comments regarding the presented study.…”
Background: Several hematological indices including subtypes of leukocytes populations have been associated with cardiovascular outcome. Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is a form of acute heart failure syndrome featured by several in-hospital complications (IHCs). Hypothesis: Hematological indices at admission may predict IHCs in TTS patients. Methods: One hundred and sixty consecutive patients with TTS were enrolled in a multicenter prospective registry. Clinical data, admission hemogram, and IHCs were recorded. Results: Incidence of IHCs was 37%, including pulmonary edema 9%, cardiogenic shock 9%, need of invasive ventilation 10%, death 8%, stroke 2.5%, and left ventricular thrombi 6%. Patients with IHCs were older, more frequently male, with physical stressor-induced TTS, lower left ventricular ejection fraction at admission. Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLr) (12 ± 12 vs 7 ± 8, P = .002) and white blood cells/mean platelet volume ratio (1.2 ± 0.5 vs 1.0 ± 0.5, P = .03) at admission were significantly higher in patients with IHCs. NLr values were predictor of IHCs (Odds ratios [OR] 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.11, P < .01). When stratified according to NLr into tertiles, the rate of IHCs was from first to third tertile was, respectively, 22%, 31%, and 58%. NLr values in the higher tertile were independent predictors of IHCs even at multivariate analysis (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.5-9.4, P < .01). NLr values higher than 5 were able to predict IHCs with a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 58%; negative predictive power was 84% (area under the ROC curve 0.73). Conclusions: NLr is an independent predictor of IHCs in patients admitted with TTS. Admission hemogram may represent a potential tool for prediction of IHCs in TTS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.