2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12917-019-1834-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

White blood cell count in birds: evaluation of a commercially available method

Abstract: BackgroundTo conduct a hematological analysis of avian blood samples, standard automated cell counting is unreliable because all avian blood cells are nucleated. Therefore, quantitative white blood cell counting in birds is still performed manually, whereby the Natt-Herrick method is widely used in veterinary laboratories. The aim of this study was to evaluate a new commercially available single test system for avian white blood cell counting, the Natt-Herricks-Tic®, which would allow easy in-house analysis by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The ease of sample collection makes blood tests one of the basic diagnostic tools in both human and veterinary medicine ( Talebi et al., 2005 ; Mitchell and Johns, 2008 ; Merska et al., 2013 ; Carisch et al., 2019 ). However, in practice, hematological tests are more rarely performed on avians than on mammals, mainly owing to the high labor intensity that is a result of the specificity of the blood cell structure and the absence of generally accepted reference values ( Talebi et al., 2005 ; Keshavarz et al., 2019 ; Stefaniak et al., 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ease of sample collection makes blood tests one of the basic diagnostic tools in both human and veterinary medicine ( Talebi et al., 2005 ; Mitchell and Johns, 2008 ; Merska et al., 2013 ; Carisch et al., 2019 ). However, in practice, hematological tests are more rarely performed on avians than on mammals, mainly owing to the high labor intensity that is a result of the specificity of the blood cell structure and the absence of generally accepted reference values ( Talebi et al., 2005 ; Keshavarz et al., 2019 ; Stefaniak et al., 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard automated cell counting is not an acceptable method for blood analysis in birds due to the specific morphological structure of avian blood cells, i.e., nucleated red blood cells and platelets. Despite major disadvantages and limitations, the manual blood cell counting technique is still the best available method of avian blood analysis (Carisch et al, 2019). Several studies confirmed large variations in the manual blood counts; reported coefficients of variation are between 20 and 40% (Har et al, 2005;Weiss and Wardrop, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies confirmed large variations in the manual blood counts; reported coefficients of variation are between 20 and 40% (Har et al, 2005;Weiss and Wardrop, 2010). A disadvantage of Natt-Herrick solution is the difficulty to differentiate thrombocytes from lymphocytes, thus creating significant counting errors (Carisch et al, 2019). In order to improve the accuracy of cell counting, several methods were used, namely, an experienced operator, same brand of properly cleaned instrumentation and material, uniform distribution of cells in the observation area, more fields and cells counted and obtaining the results from at least 3 repetitions (Walberg, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The packed cell volume (PCV) was determined using the Microhematocrit method while the red blood cell (RBC) count and total white blood cell (WBC) count were determined using the hemocytometer method [35]. Hemoglobin (Hb) concentration was determined using Drabkin's reagent assay method for Hb concentration.…”
Section: Hematological and Serum Biochemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%