2000
DOI: 10.1126/science.289.5483.1355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whistle Matching in Wild Bottlenose Dolphins ( Tursiops truncatus )

Abstract: Dolphin communication is suspected to be complex, on the basis of their call repertoires, cognitive abilities, and ability to modify signals through vocal learning. Because of the difficulties involved in observing and recording individual cetaceans, very little is known about how they use their calls. This report shows that wild, unrestrained bottlenose dolphins use their learned whistles in matching interactions, in which an individual responds to a whistle of a conspecific by emitting the same whistle type.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
203
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 358 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
203
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, learning also allows copying of signals in direct social interactions. Dolphins frequently copy each other's whistles in the wild (30). The fact that signature whistle shape carries identity information independent from voice features presents the possibility to use these whistles as referential signals, either addressing individuals or referring to them, similar to the use of names in humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, learning also allows copying of signals in direct social interactions. Dolphins frequently copy each other's whistles in the wild (30). The fact that signature whistle shape carries identity information independent from voice features presents the possibility to use these whistles as referential signals, either addressing individuals or referring to them, similar to the use of names in humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bottle-nosed dolphins (Tursiops truncates) produce individually distinct whistles that may serve in individual identification (Janik, 2000). Similarly, a number of authors have reported individual differences within certain types of primate vocalizations, suggesting that some primate calls may possess signature features as well-for example, Lemur catta (Macedonia, 1986;Oda, 2002), Saimiri sciureus (Boinski & Mitchell, 1997;Soltis, Bernhards, Donkin, & Newman, 2002), Callithrix jacchus (Jones, Harris, & Catchpole, 1993), Macaca sylvanus (Hammerschmidt & Todt, 1995), and Presbytis thomasi (Wich, Koski, de Vries, & van Schaik, 2003).…”
Section: Vocal Plasticity and Vocal Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a hydrophone array to localize underwater sounds, Janik (2000) reported whistle matching by unidentified individuals in the Moray Firth, Scotland. He recorded 176 whistle 'interactions' where whistles occurred in close temporal proximity but too far apart spatially for one individual to have swum rapidly between locations to produce both.…”
Section: Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%