2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3586077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which Workers Bear the Burden of Social Distancing Policies?

Abstract: Thanks to SafeGraph for making their data available to us, as well as other researchers studying the consequences of the Coronavirus epidemic. Thanks to Gianluca Violante and Greg Kaplan for making available their codes. Our measures at the three digit occupation level are available on our websites. The views expressed in this study are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the Federal Reserve System, or the National Bureau of Economic Research… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
178
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
9
178
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A related set of papers provides evidence of differences in the effects of the pandemic by socioeconomic status. Mongey et al ( 2020 ) analyze the characteristics of workers in jobs that are most likely to be affected by social distancing measures. They demonstrate that these people are more economically vulnerable and live in areas that engage in less social distancing.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A related set of papers provides evidence of differences in the effects of the pandemic by socioeconomic status. Mongey et al ( 2020 ) analyze the characteristics of workers in jobs that are most likely to be affected by social distancing measures. They demonstrate that these people are more economically vulnerable and live in areas that engage in less social distancing.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boeri et al [70] have proposed a classification of home workers in three types: Type 1 (complete WFH), Type 2 (WFH and limited mobility but no face-toface interaction) and Type 3 (WFH, mobility and limited interaction). Dingel and Neiman [71] and Mongey et al [72] have used the US O � Net survey to classify work activities in terms of their potential for WFH. Overall they estimate that complete WFH can be done for 30-35% of work positions, while WFH with limited mobility may achieve approximately 50% of workers.…”
Section: Remote Workingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies document significant increases in unemployment and estimate job loss numbers of up to 20 million. Mongey et al. (2020) indicate that workers in “low-ability-to-work-from-home” sectors experienced greater losses in short-term employment and are also more likely to be economically vulnerable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%