Which technology to which challenge in democratic governance? An approach using design science research

Abstract

Purpose Information systems (IS) play an important role in contemporary society, but critical questions remain on their potential use and impact on democracy. This study aims to contribute to the discussion on which technology can be adequate to which major challenge of democratic governance, through the identification and pairing of challenges of democratic governance with specific information technologies with the potential to be used in applications related to this challenge. This perspective can be considered positioned in the confluence between IS, political science and public administration. Design/methodology/approach Design science research, a research approach in IS, was used. The suggestion of a conceptual framework with pairs of challenges in democratic governance and information technologies was initially developed. In a subsequent phase, this framework was discussed and assessed through interviews with a panel of selected experts in e-government and IS, reaching a revised conceptual framework. Findings Results suggest that the conceptual pairing of challenges in democratic governance with IS’s solutions such as artificial intelligence, systems integration or blockchain technologies, for instance, if used in a critical, transparent and accountable way, can play a role in capacitating the delivery of better public services and contribute to encouraging citizen trust and political participation. These results may contribute to open a methodological agenda dedicated to the selection of adequate IS resources to address specific challenges of democratic governance, as well as to help in the development of public policies in the area. Originality/value Previous studies on digital government offer important insights on the impact of information and communication technologies-enabled public governance tools for government openness, public service efficiency and user-friendliness, and for citizen political participation and societal mobilization. But the literature still lacks a systematic conceptual framework mapping and assessing the role of distinctive IS instruments in democratic challenge-solving and specifying functional relationships between specific technology and democratic outcomes. This paper aims to contribute to filling this analytical gap.

Exploring the Role of ICTs and Communication Flows in the Forest Sector

“…For these reasons, we believe that they can be used to improve energy efficiency and digital infrastructure in the forestry sector. This fact is corroborated by a study carried out by Anastasiadou et al [158] which points out that ICTs can help address the challenges of governance and population participation. In addition, Badiane et al [159] state that ICTs can also provide opportunities to strengthen the capacities and skills of the forestry sector both in the public and private spheres, which can be especially important in the context of trade opening.…”

Use of Artificial Intelligence in Public Services: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization

“…The integration of information technology solutions such as AI, system integration, or blockchain technology with democratic governance can help improve public service delivery, enhance citizen trust, and foster political participation if they are implemented in a transparent, accountable, and responsible way [28]. AI applications have the potential to make cities more intelligent and enhance the lifestyles of residents by providing quicker access to goods and services [29].…”

AI and public contests: a model to improve the evaluation and selection of public contest candidates in the Police Force

“…Design science research (DSR) is the methodological approach used to connect and pair relevant challenges in the recruitment processes of PF with AI tools that might reveal the potential for purposes related to those challenges. Three studies use this novelty type of paradigm (Anastasiadou, 2019; Anastasiadou et al , 2021; Rosenberger et al , 2017). Because it is a problem-solving paradigm, it tries to create a designed final artifact or solution to a precise problem (Anastasiadou, 2019).…”