2013
DOI: 10.1057/pcs.2013.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which subject, whose desire? The constitution of subjectivity and the articulation of desire in the practice of research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I thought, he's not gonna like being dressed and washed and bathed, but he was quite happy, very happy, but it just … doesn't seem to be the same.But, rather than characterise the more critical comments as aberrant cases of collective hysteria in an otherwise harmonious life, we argue that these ‘islands of over investment’ index something important about the way in which identities are negotiated, and how discursive elements become fantasies that are variously enjoyed. We cannot know for sure what animates this enjoyment, since this would require intimate familiarity with the specific discourse of the subject (Lapping 2013; see also Frosh 2010) and focus groups, although intense and emotionally charged, can only offer but a cursory insight here. For some, the presence of frailer residents poses no threat to them; for others, though, we might argue that the perception of a failed promise to rejuvenate the collective has become something of a fixation which procures a kind of enjoyment.…”
Section: A Fantasy Of Rejuvenationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I thought, he's not gonna like being dressed and washed and bathed, but he was quite happy, very happy, but it just … doesn't seem to be the same.But, rather than characterise the more critical comments as aberrant cases of collective hysteria in an otherwise harmonious life, we argue that these ‘islands of over investment’ index something important about the way in which identities are negotiated, and how discursive elements become fantasies that are variously enjoyed. We cannot know for sure what animates this enjoyment, since this would require intimate familiarity with the specific discourse of the subject (Lapping 2013; see also Frosh 2010) and focus groups, although intense and emotionally charged, can only offer but a cursory insight here. For some, the presence of frailer residents poses no threat to them; for others, though, we might argue that the perception of a failed promise to rejuvenate the collective has become something of a fixation which procures a kind of enjoyment.…”
Section: A Fantasy Of Rejuvenationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guattari suggests that the interpretation of moments of productive escape involves a sensibility to the multiplicity of 'real complexions' that 'do not have the same ontological colouring as each other ' (p. 18). Where the Deleuzian/Guattarian ontological orientation foregrounds politics as a sensibility to new materialities, the Lacanian (anti)epistemological orientation foregrounds an ethical commitment to ignorance, sensitive to the dangers of imposing the interpretations of the analyst onto the other (Lacan, 1991;Lapping, 2011Lapping, , 2013a. This contrasting orientation plays out in the contrasting conceptualisations of 'time', as virtuality, or as a traumatic and unknowable Real.…”
Section: The Production Of Chronological Temporality In Identificatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…My analysis of this data has drawn on psychoanalytic and psychoanalytically informed social theory, from a predominantly Lacanian perspective (Lapping, 2013a(Lapping, , 2013b. The analysis offered here also engages primarily with Lacanian ideas.…”
Section: Introduction: the Politics Of Time And The Subjectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the dimension of discourse in which the researcher 's investments are prone to play the greatest role, with a danger of reading in the text for what one is looking for or hopes to find, or giving in to the impression that the interlocutor and the respondent are speaking of the same object (e.g. Lapping, ). Finally, the Real of the text is the underlying ‘centre of gravity’, which simultaneously resists adequate representation or verbalisation by subjects.…”
Section: Lacanian Discourse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%