This article represents a critical overview of strategies to examine subjectivity in discourse, highlighting a series of methodological approaches, which seek to manage the tension between discourse studies' focus on social and cultural structures, and psychoanalysis' interest in unconscious motivations. One aim is to trouble the supposed opposition between discourse analysis and the psychosocial approach and to regard the latter as a possible extension of insights established by the former. It is argued here that psychosocial readings in general, and Lacanian approaches more specifically, offer a cautious, nuanced way of introducing psychoanalytic ideas into the analysis of texts. The first part of this article offers examples of discourse analytic approaches, which have explicitly sought to incorporate psychoanalytic notions, followed by a discussion of Lacanian discourse analysis -a method shaped directly by this psychoanalytic school's concern with language. The article concludes with a series of methodological injunctions for conducting a psychosocial form of textual analysis.After the 'turn to language' in the social sciences, the 1980s brought about a renewed interest in the formation and experience of subjectivity (Hollway, 2011). This article highlights a series of methodological approaches, which seek to manage the tension between discourse studies' focus on social and cultural structures informing the way subjects behave and conceive of themselves, and psychoanalysis' interest in unconscious motivations. It represents a critical overview of strategies to examine how subjectivity is 'produced and reproduced in the text, as embodied and "invested" discourse' (Saville Young & Frosh, 2010: 518), that is, how subjectivity is articulated by, and constituted through language. The aim is to trouble the supposed opposition between discourse analysis and a more psychosocial approach and to regard the latter as a possible extension of insights established by the former.Since the field of discourse studies is too vast to fully parse the distinctions between all of its subdivisions, the first part of this article offers examples of discourse analytic approaches, which have explicitly sought to incorporate psychoanalytic notions, focusing on interventions by Wendy Hollway and Michael Billig, who demonstrate two very different methods of accounting for subjectivity in discourse. This is followed by a discussion of Lacanian discourse analysis, a method shaped directly by this psychoanalytic school's concern with language and the analytic encounter. The article concludes with a series of methodological injunctions for conducting a psychosocial form of textual analysis ('texts' here broadly designating forms of transcribed data), using examples from the work of Claudia Lapping and Stephen Frosh.The move from discourse to psyche, or from language to what is seemingly beyond its confines, is one of the central methodological preoccupations of psychosocial studies. A psychosocial approach is of utility to those social rese...