2022
DOI: 10.21449/ijate.946231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which scale short form development method is better? A Comparison of ACO, TS, and SCOFA

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to identify which scale short-form development method produces better findings in different factor structures. A simulation study was designed based on this purpose. Three different factor structures and three simulation conditions were selected. As the findings of this simulation study, the model-data fit and reliability coefficients were reported for each factor structure in each simulation condition. All analyses were conducted under the R environment. According to the findings … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This exceeds the criteria required for structural equation modelling ( Bentler & Chou, 1987 ; Wolf et al., 2013 ). Whilst guidelines regarding adequate sample size for ACO do not currently exist, this sample size was determined to be more than sufficient, given that this method has been demonstrated to cope well with major misspecifications at a sixth of the sample size ( Koğar, 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This exceeds the criteria required for structural equation modelling ( Bentler & Chou, 1987 ; Wolf et al., 2013 ). Whilst guidelines regarding adequate sample size for ACO do not currently exist, this sample size was determined to be more than sufficient, given that this method has been demonstrated to cope well with major misspecifications at a sixth of the sample size ( Koğar, 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This exceeds the criteria required for structural equation modelling (Bentler and Chou, 1987;Wolf et al, 2013). Whilst guidelines regarding adequate sample size for ACO do not currently exist, this sample size was determined to be more than sufficient, given that this method has been demonstrated to cope well with major misspecifications at a sixth of the sample size (Koğar, 2022).…”
Section: Participants and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%