1981
DOI: 10.1002/jgt.3190050407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which rational numbers are binding numbers?

Abstract: The concept of the binding number of a graph was introduced by Woodall in 1973. In this paper w e characterize the set F, of all pairs (a, b ) of integers such that there is a graph G with n vertices and binding number alb that has a realizing set of b vertices. BINDING NUMBERS OF CERTAIN SPECIAL GRAPHSDefinition. (Woodall [2]) Let V = V(G) denote the set of vertices and E = E(G) the set of edges of the graph G. For x E V(G) let T ( x ) denote the set of all vertices of G which are adjacent to x. For X C V(G) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is more relevant to focus our attention to the problem of determining the truncated version of the binding number (and binding set) problem, namely min{bind(G), 1}.G i v e nag r a p hG, we either conclude that bind(G) ≥ 1o r ,i f bind(G) < 1, we want to find inclusionwise maximal binding set U .I fbind(G) < 1 then every binding set U of G is an independent set of G ( [8]). In the following lemma we prove some important properties of binding sets.…”
Section: Binding Number and Binding Set Of A Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is more relevant to focus our attention to the problem of determining the truncated version of the binding number (and binding set) problem, namely min{bind(G), 1}.G i v e nag r a p hG, we either conclude that bind(G) ≥ 1o r ,i f bind(G) < 1, we want to find inclusionwise maximal binding set U .I fbind(G) < 1 then every binding set U of G is an independent set of G ( [8]). In the following lemma we prove some important properties of binding sets.…”
Section: Binding Number and Binding Set Of A Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a graph G, we either conclude that bind(G) ≥ 1 or, if bind(G) < 1, we want to find inclusionwise maximal binding set U . If bind(G) < 1 then every binding set U of G is an independent set of G ( [8]). In the following lemma we prove some important properties of binding sets.…”
Section: Binding Number and Binding Set Of A Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of Lemma 1 Proof. (i) Let U be a binding set of G. If bind(G) < 1 then U is an independent set, as observed in [8]. Put U I = U ∩I, U H = U ∩H and U K = U ∩K.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For concepts not defined here see [2], [3]. We enlist few results from [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] and [7] and are as follows, Proposition 1.1. (see [7]) If G is a bipartite graph, then bind(G) ≤ 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposition 1.7. (see [5]) Let G be graph with n vertices. If bind(G) < 1, then every realizing set for bind(G) is independent and |Γ(X…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%