Which questionnaire is more effective for follow-up diagnosed subacromial impingement syndrome? A comparison of the responsiveness of SDQ, SPADI and WORC index

Doğu, Beril; Şahin, Füsun; Ozmaden, Aslı; Yılmaz, Figen; Kuran, Banu

doi:10.3233/bmr-2012-0342

Cited by 17 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The total score varies between 0 and 100 [ 6 ]. It takes approximately 2–3 min to complete [ 30 , 31 ]. The SPADI is considered to be easy to understand by patients [ 31 ], and no floor or ceiling effects have been detected [ 32 , 33 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of measurement properties of self-administered PROMs aimed at patients with non-specific shoulder pain and “activity limitations”: a systematic review

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo critically appraise and compare the measurement properties of self-administered patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) focussing on the shoulder, assessing “activity limitations.”Study designSystematic review. The study population had to consist of patients with shoulder pain. We excluded postoperative patients or patients with generic diseases. The methodological quality of the selected studies and the results of the measurement properties were critically appraised and rated using the COSMIN checklist.ResultsOut of a total of 3427 unique hits, 31 articles, evaluating 7 different questionnaires, were included. The SPADI is the most frequently evaluated PROM and its measurement properties seem adequate apart from a lack of information regarding its measurement error and content validity.ConclusionFor English, Norwegian and Turkish users, we recommend to use the SPADI. Dutch users could use either the SDQ or the SST. In German, we recommend the DASH. In Tamil, Slovene, Spanish and the Danish languages, the evaluated PROMs were not yet of acceptable validity. None of these PROMs showed strong positive evidence for all measurement properties. We propose to develop a new shoulder PROM focused on activity limitations, taking new knowledge and techniques into account.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of measurement properties of self-administered PROMs aimed at patients with non-specific shoulder pain and “activity limitations”: a systematic review

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…30 Both the WORC and NPRS have been validated previously and demonstrate good to high reliability for individuals with shoulder pain (ICC's of .89 and .74 respectively). [31][32][33][34] Additional secondary outcome measures were tested in the following order: Isometric strength values, active range of motion (AROM), the upper quarter Y-balance test (UQYBT) and Global Rating of Change (GROC). Isometric strength values were measured using the microFET2© hand held dynamometer (HHD) (Hoggan Health Industries, West Jordan, Utah) a per the protocol described by Kolber et al 35 Isometric external rotation, internal rotation and abduction strength were all tested with participants seated and supported by an armless chair.…”

Section: Outcome Measures and Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Shoulder External Rotator Eccentric Training Versus General Shoulder Exercise for Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Chaconas

Kolber

Hanney

et al. 2017

Intl J Sports Phys Ther

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Shoulder pain affects up to 67% of the population at some point in their lifetime with subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS) representing a common etiology. Despite a plethora of studies there remains conflicting evidence for appropriate management of SAPS.Purpose: To compare outcomes, for individuals diagnosed with SAPS, performing a 6-week protocol of eccentric training of the shoulder external rotators (ETER) compared to a general exercise (GE) protocol. Study Design: Randomized controlled trialMethods: Forty-eight individuals (mean age 46.8 years +/-17.29) with chronic shoulder pain, and a clinical diagnosis of SAPS were randomized into either an experimental group performing ETER or a control group performing a GE program. The intervention lasted for six weeks, and outcomes were measured after three weeks, six weeks, and again at six months post intervention.

show abstract

“…This outcome measures pain and disability associated with shoulder impairment (Roach, Budiman-Mak, Songsiridej, & Lertratanakul, 1991) and is frequently used for assessment of SSI syndrome (Dogu, Sahin, Ozmaden, Yilmaz, & Kuran, 2013). The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to measure pain at rest and during activity (Jensen, Karoly, & Braver, 1986).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Isokinetic clinical assessment of rotator cuff strength in subacromial shoulder impingement

Land

Gordon

Watt

2017

Musculoskeletal Science and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Current conservative management of subacromial shoulder impingement (SSI) includes generic strengthening exercises, especially for internal (IR) and external (ER) shoulder rotators. However, there is no evidence that the strength or the ratio of strength between these muscle groups is different between those with SSI (cases) and an asymptomatic population (controls).Objective: To identify if isokinetic rotator cuff strength or the ratio of strength is significantly different between cases and controls.Study Design: Case Control Study.Method: Fifty one cases with SSI and 51 asymptomatic controls matched for age, gender, hand dominance and physical activity level completed isokinetic peak torque glenohumeral IR and ER testing. Within the SSI group, 31 dominant limbs were symptomatic and 20 non-dominant limbs were symptomatic. IR and ER were measured separately using continuous reciprocal concentric (con) and eccentric (ecc) contraction cycles at a speed of 60 0 degrees per second and again at 120 0 degrees per second. Values of peak torque (PT), relative peak torque (RPT) and ratios were compared using independent t-tests between the SSI and asymptomatic groups.Results: Significant strength differences between the two groups were present only when the symptomatic SSI shoulder was the dominant shoulder (con ER PT at 60 0 /second, ecc ER PT at 120 0 /second, ecc ER RPT at 120 0 /second and ecc IR PT at 60 0 /second and 120 0 /second). Conclusions:Changes in rotator cuff strength in SSI may be related to limb dominance, which may have implications for strengthening regimes. Level of Evidence:Level 3a

show abstract

Which questionnaire is more effective for follow-up diagnosed subacromial impingement syndrome? A comparison of the responsiveness of SDQ, SPADI and WORC index

Cited by 17 publications

References 19 publications

Evaluation of measurement properties of self-administered PROMs aimed at patients with non-specific shoulder pain and “activity limitations”: a systematic review

Evaluation of measurement properties of self-administered PROMs aimed at patients with non-specific shoulder pain and “activity limitations”: a systematic review

Shoulder External Rotator Eccentric Training Versus General Shoulder Exercise for Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Isokinetic clinical assessment of rotator cuff strength in subacromial shoulder impingement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About