2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2006.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which pattern? Biasing aspects of planar calibration patterns and detection methods

Abstract: This paper provides a comparative study on the use of planar patterns in the generation of control points for camera calibration. This is an important but often neglected aspect in camera calibration. Two popular checkerboard and circular dot patterns are each examined with two detection strategies for invariance to the potential bias from projective transformations and nonlinear distortions. It is theoretically and experimentally shown that circular patterns can potentially be affected by both biasing sources… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
54
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to calculate image coordinates pi,j,k for each marker, we have implemented in MATLAB the image processing algorithms for detection of dot and chessboard pattern from [30]. All automatically processed images of calibration and test sequences have been checked manually afterwards to delete points in low-illuminated areas, around glare, etc.…”
Section: Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to calculate image coordinates pi,j,k for each marker, we have implemented in MATLAB the image processing algorithms for detection of dot and chessboard pattern from [30]. All automatically processed images of calibration and test sequences have been checked manually afterwards to delete points in low-illuminated areas, around glare, etc.…”
Section: Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The robustness of the control point detection under these two transformations is based on the combination of the pattern employed and on the detection method used. Therefore, there are two possible sources of bias in control point recovery which are named according to Mallon and Whealan [9]: perspective bias and distortion bias. The main goal would be to obtain bias free data, as this is clearly necessary for obtaining unbiased estimates for calibration algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is not always the case. The bias does not have the same magnitude for all types of patterns: for example, Mallon and Whealan [9] show that detected control points obtained by using centroid recovery principle can potentially be corrupted by both perspective bias and distortion bias, with the likelihood of larger distortion bias magnitude in a typical camera. They also show that the compensation of distortion bias from such circular pattern points is not possible without knowing the distortion field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input requirements of planar approaches simply involve imaging a planar target. Planar calibration targets such as a chessboard or circular dot patterns are commonly used to specify the planar feature points [8]. The stability of these planar calibration methods has been well studied in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%