2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2005.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Which path” decoherence in quantum dot experiments

Abstract: We analyze and interpret recent optical experiments with semiconductor quantum dots. We derive a quantitative relation between the amount of information transferred into the environment and the optical polarization that may be observed in a spectroscopy experiment.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I. The Hamiltonian of the system under consideration in the absence of the laser field can be exactly diagonalized by application of unitary Weyl operators performing the transition into the polaron picture 33,34 …”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I. The Hamiltonian of the system under consideration in the absence of the laser field can be exactly diagonalized by application of unitary Weyl operators performing the transition into the polaron picture 33,34 …”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time evolution of the system is calculated exactly using the Weyl operator method [8,9] up to a local unitary rotation (conserving the amount of entanglement). The transformed density matrix may be written in the operator sum representation (see [10] for details)…”
Section: The Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seminal studies of decoherence using matter wave interferometers [7][8][9][10][11], trapped ions [12], microwave cavities [13], superconducting circuits [14,15], and quantum dots [16,17] illustrate mechanisms that limit quantum sensors, quantum memory, and quantum information processing gate fidelity. Decoherence is usually described as a culprit that causes deleterious effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%