Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4068(97)00068-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which one should I imitate?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
97
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
97
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact was previously only known for n = 1 and n = 2 (Schlag, 1998(Schlag, , 1999. Interestingly enough, the dynamics generated by SPOR n tends to Maynard Smith's adjusted replicator dynamics when the sample size n grows to infinity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This fact was previously only known for n = 1 and n = 2 (Schlag, 1998(Schlag, , 1999. Interestingly enough, the dynamics generated by SPOR n tends to Maynard Smith's adjusted replicator dynamics when the sample size n grows to infinity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…We restrict attention to individual behavior (what to play next) that is only a function of the information in the sample and of the own choice and payoff in the previous round. An example of such a behavioral rule is the sequentially evaluated Proportional Observation Rule (SPOR n , Schlag, 1999). Given this imitation rule, an individual considers each individual in his sample separately, switching to the strategy observed with a probability that is proportional to the observed payoff.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…28 We estimated the full model by maximum-likelihood 29 and progressively obtained a more compact model regarding the random-effects through LR tests. 30 The random-slope variance was not significant for 'best response' at the 15% level in treatment 'incomplete' and even at the 40% level in treatment 'complete'. It was also not significant for 'imitate the best' at the 10% level and for 'follow the exemplary' at the 40% level.…”
Section: Individual Behaviormentioning
confidence: 87%
“…29 The model was estimated using GLLAMM (see Skrondal and Rabe-Hesketh, 2004). 30 Here the "naive" p-values are already corrected by division by two (see, e.g., Skrondal and Rabe-Hesketh 2004). 31 In both treatments subject-heteroskedastic level-1 variance (whose estimates are omitted for simplicity) was significant according to LR tests (p-value <0.000).…”
Section: [Table 8 About Here]mentioning
confidence: 99%