Which method is more effective for accelerating canine distalization short term, low-level laser therapy or piezocision? A split-mouth study

Türker, Gökhan; Yavuz, İbrahim; Gönen, Zeynep Burçin

doi:10.1007/s00056-020-00250-6

Cited by 11 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A summary of the excluded articles after full-text assessment with reasons for exclusion is presented in the table in Appendices. Finally, six studies (four RCTs and two CCTs) were included in the SR [ 23 , 32 - 36 ]. The PRISMA flow diagram is presented in Figure 1 .…”

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The characteristics of the six included trials are given in Table 2 and Table 3 [ 23 , 32 - 36 ]. Only one protocol trial was found; more information about that ongoing research project is shown in Table 4 and Table 5 .…”

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Four completed RCTs [ 23 , 32 - 34 ] and two CCTs [ 35 , 36 ], including 154 patients, were included in this review. The age range was from 15 to 29 years.…”

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One study included only female patients [ 32 ], whereas, in another study, the number of females was less than that of males [ 35 ]. In three studies, the number of females was more than that of males [ 33 , 34 , 36 ]. Sex distribution was not given in only one study [ 23 ].…”

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Four of the included studies were of a split-mouth design (SMD) [ 33 - 36 ], and two were of a compound (COMP) design (both parallel and split-mouth) [ 23 , 32 ]. In the compound-design studies, the surgical sides in the experimental groups were compared with the non-surgical sides in the other experimental groups since the contralateral sides in these groups did not undergo any acceleration (traditional orthodontic treatment only) [ 23 , 32 ].…”

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Surgical Interventions Versus Non-surgical Ones When Used in Conjunction With Fixed Appliances to Accelerate Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review

Alfailany¹,

Hajeer²,

Burhan³

et al. 2022

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objectives of this review were to evaluate the currently available evidence regarding the effectiveness of surgical versus non-surgical acceleration methods and the side effects associated with these methods. Nine databases were searched: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE ® , Scopus ® , PubMed ® , Web of Science™, Google™ Scholar, Trip, OpenGrey, and PQDT OPEN from pro-Quest ® . ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal (ICTRP) were screened to explore ongoing studies and unpublished literature. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), as well as controlled clinical trials (CCTs) of patients who received surgical interventions (invasive or minimally invasive techniques) in conjunction with traditional fixed appliances and who were compared to the non-surgical interventions, were included. The Cochrane tool for risk of bias (RoB.2) was used for evaluating RCTs, whereas the ROBINS-I tool was used for the CCTs. This systematic review included four RCTs and two CCTs (154 patients). The surgical and non-surgical interventions were found to have the same effect on orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) accelerating in four trials. In contrast, the surgical interventions were superior in the other two studies. High heterogeneity among the included studies prevented conducting the quantitative synthesis of the findings. The reported side effects related to the surgical and non-surgical interventions were similar. A "very low" to "low" evidence indicates that the effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical interventions in the acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement is similar, with no differences in the associated side effects. More high-quality clinical trials to compare the acceleration effectiveness between both modalities in different types of malocclusion is required.

show abstract

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Four completed RCTs [ 23 , 32 - 34 ] and two CCTs [ 35 , 36 ], including 154 patients, were included in this review. The age range was from 15 to 29 years.…”

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Surgical Interventions Versus Non-surgical Ones When Used in Conjunction With Fixed Appliances to Accelerate Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review

Alfailany¹,

Hajeer²,

Burhan³

et al. 2022

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Low-level laser therapy, piezocision, or their combination vs. conventional treatment for orthodontic tooth movement

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Effect of low-level laser therapy on en masse retraction in females with bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion

Dehis,

El Sharaby,

Eid

et al. 2024

J Orofac Orthop

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Acceleration of tooth movement has gained remarkable attention during the last decade. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on en masse retraction of upper anterior teeth in adult women with bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. Materials and methods In this two-arm parallel trial, 36 women with bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion were randomly divided into two equal groups. Eligibility criteria included class I Angle molar relationship, good general and oral health as well as no systemic disease or syndrome. Four temporary anchorage devices (TADs) were used in the upper and lower arches for anchorage purposes. A 0.019×0.025-inch stainless steel wire with crimped hooks just distal to the maxillary canines was inserted. Nickle titanium (NiTi) closed coil springs (200 g/side) were employed for en masse retraction following extraction of the first premolars. In the laser group (LG), retraction of the upper anterior teeth was done along with the application of LLLT on days 0, 3, 7, and 14 after extraction and then repeated biweekly until the end of retraction. Retraction was completed without LLLT application in the nonlaser group (NLG). Data concerning the rate of retraction as well as first molars and anterior positional changes were gained from digitized models and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans taken just before extraction and at the end of retraction. Treatment-associated pain and root resorption were evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) and CBCT scans, respectively. Results Four patients dropped out prior to follow-up. The duration of retraction was 10.125 ± 2.876 and 13.643 ± 3.455 months in the LG and NLG, respectively. The LG showed a statistically significant faster rate of en masse retraction (0.833 ± 0.371 mm/month) compared to the NLG (0.526 ± 0.268 mm/month; P ≤ 0.035). The observed root resorption was significantly less in the LG (P ≤ 0.05) with comparable pain scores in both groups. Conclusions Within the constraints of the parameters of the LLLT used in the current study and despite the statistically significant results on the rate of en masse retraction and the associated root resorption, LLLT did not demonstrate a clinically relevant effect that justifies its use to enhance en masse retraction. Name of the registry Clinicaltrials.gov Trial registration number NCT05183451 Date of registration January 10, 2022, “Retrospectively registered” URL of trial registry record https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05183451

show abstract

Which method is more effective for accelerating canine distalization short term, low-level laser therapy or piezocision? A split-mouth study

Cited by 11 publications

References 30 publications

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Surgical Interventions Versus Non-surgical Ones When Used in Conjunction With Fixed Appliances to Accelerate Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Surgical Interventions Versus Non-surgical Ones When Used in Conjunction With Fixed Appliances to Accelerate Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review

Low-level laser therapy, piezocision, or their combination vs. conventional treatment for orthodontic tooth movement

Effect of low-level laser therapy on en masse retraction in females with bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About