2020
DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which low‐dose atropine for myopia control?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several limitations to our study. Current clinical practice has generally moved away from the earlier practice of prescribing higher concentrations of atropine (0.5–1%) to the use of low-dose atropine, typically 0.01–0.05% 43 , 44 . Our study used 0.3% atropine, and so the effects we observed may be more apparent and rapid than that expected with low-dose atropine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several limitations to our study. Current clinical practice has generally moved away from the earlier practice of prescribing higher concentrations of atropine (0.5–1%) to the use of low-dose atropine, typically 0.01–0.05% 43 , 44 . Our study used 0.3% atropine, and so the effects we observed may be more apparent and rapid than that expected with low-dose atropine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance level was similar to what we found in our analysis (p = 0.0015). However, Khanal and Philips [33] have recently concluded after re-analyzing data of the ATOM2 study [12] and the LAMP study [15] that there is only little evidence that this dose had a significant effect on axial growth. They even argue that treatment with 0.01% atropine might delay the implementation of an effective dose in a myopic child and that 0.025% or 0.05% should be used instead.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Treatment Effects Of Atropinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fu et al reported that 0.01% atropine significantly reduced myopia progression over a 12-month period as measured by AL when compared with a control group (average 0.14 mm, p = 0.004) (19). However, Khanal et al [21] asserted that 0.01% atropine could not slow the abnormal eye enlargement, thus delaying implementing an effective dose. Li et al [22] have pointed out that this phenomenon may be due to the sample size among previous studies powered primarily based on SER change and concluded that a larger sample size is needed to detect the difference in AL elongation between the 0.01% atropine and placebo groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%