2010
DOI: 10.1097/mou.0b013e32833a4420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which injectable to use in the treatment of intrinsic sphincter deficiency?

Abstract: The ideal periurethral injectable agent has not yet been identified though many of the currently used agents have acceptable efficacy in selected populations. There is active research into novel therapies that may prove effective.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[14][15][16][17] In these cases, improvement of urinary continence requires increased urethral closure pressure. Injection of a bulking agent, such as collagen, into the periurethral tissue, [18][19][20][21] and surgical implantation of a device, such as artificial urinary sphincter, 22,23 have been widely accepted as treatments for the intrinsic sphincter deficiencyrelated SUI. For the majority of patients, the benefits of these treatments are not enough because the continence rate sharply decreases with time, 24,25 or the injection or implantation of these materials can cause severe side effects, such as inflammation, foreign giant cell responses, abscesses, erosions, and voiding dysfunction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16][17] In these cases, improvement of urinary continence requires increased urethral closure pressure. Injection of a bulking agent, such as collagen, into the periurethral tissue, [18][19][20][21] and surgical implantation of a device, such as artificial urinary sphincter, 22,23 have been widely accepted as treatments for the intrinsic sphincter deficiencyrelated SUI. For the majority of patients, the benefits of these treatments are not enough because the continence rate sharply decreases with time, 24,25 or the injection or implantation of these materials can cause severe side effects, such as inflammation, foreign giant cell responses, abscesses, erosions, and voiding dysfunction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a common tendency for the improvement in urinary incontinence to decrease over time in these studies, but no consensus as to the best agent and injection technique could be reached. According to Rovner and Goudelocke [46], "the ideal periurethral injectable agent has not yet been identified although many of the currently used agents have acceptable efficacy in selected populations" [47].…”
Section: Overview Of Ubasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these circumstances, improvement of urinary continence requires increased urethral closure pressure. Injection of a bulking agent, such as collagen, into the periurethral tissue has been widely accepted; 20–23 however, the long‐term benefits are not satisfactory because the continence rate sharply decreases with time 24,25 . Surgical implantation of a device, such as an artificial urinary sphincter, has also been accepted as a treatment for this type of incontinence 26,27 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%