Which Implant Should We Use for Primary Total Hip Replacement?

Keurentjes, J. Christiaan; Pijls, Bart G; Tol, Floris R van; Mentink, Jill F; Mes, Stephanie D.; Schoones, Jan W.; Fiocco, Marta; Sedrakyan, Art; Nelissen, Rob G H H

doi:10.2106/jbjs.n.00397

Cited by 27 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 97 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Similar to MacLeod et al [11], current evidence [12][13][14][15][16][17] and expert opinion were used to design two new grading systems, one for the analysis of diagnostic information quality (Table 1) and a second for the assessment of treatment information quality (Table 2). Both grading systems had a scale of 0 to 12.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

YouTube provides irrelevant information for the diagnosis and treatment of hip arthritis

Koller

Waldstein

Schatz

et al. 2016

International Orthopaedics (SICOT)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose YouTube is increasingly becoming a key source for people to satisfy the need for additional information concerning their medical condition. This study analyses the completeness of accurate information found on YouTube pertaining to hip arthritis. Methods The present study analyzed 133 YouTube videos using the search terms: hip arthritis, hip arthritis symptoms, hip arthritis diagnosis, hip arthritis treatment and hip replacement. Two quality assessment checklists with a scale of 0 to 12 points were developed to evaluate available video content for the diagnosis and the treatment of hip arthritis. Videos were grouped into poor quality (grade 0-3), moderate quality (grade 4-7) and excellent quality (grade 8-12), respectively. Three independent observers assessed all videos using the new grading system and independently scored all videos. Discrepancies regarding the categories were clarified by consensus discussion. For intra-observer reliabilities, grading was performed at two occasions separated by four weeks.Results Eighty-four percent (n = 112) had a poor diagnostic information quality, 14% (n = 19) a moderate quality and only 2% (n = 2) an excellent quality, respectively. In 86% (n = 114), videos provided poor treatment information quality. Eleven percent (n = 15) of videos had a moderate quality and only 3% (n = 4) an excellent quality, respectively. Conclusions The present study demonstrates that YouTube is a poor source for accurate information pertaining to the diagnosis and treatment of hip arthritis. These finding are of high relevance for clinicians as videos are going to become the primary source of information for patients. Therefore, high quality educational videos are needed to further guide patients on the way from the diagnosis of hip arthritis to its proper treatment.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

YouTube provides irrelevant information for the diagnosis and treatment of hip arthritis

Koller

Waldstein

Schatz

et al. 2016

International Orthopaedics (SICOT)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…N.00397) 23 . Estimates of revision surgery were extracted from all relevant studies as well as registries (annual reports).…”

Section: Other Icor Studies Of Devices and Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

National and International Postmarket Research and Surveillance Implementation

Sedrakyan

Paxton

Graves

et al. 2014

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In some regions the cemented stems were less than 4% in 2013, 39 in other countries they were more than 68% in the same year. 44 All around the world at the moment there is still a tendency toward the increase of the number of cementless fixation that is in contrast with registries and published data outcome 45 which do not justify this tendency.…”

Section: Overview Of Advances In Thamentioning

(Expert classified)

Advances in hip arthroplasty surgery: what is justified?

Zagra

2017

EFORT Open Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery has shown dramatic changes in terms of increased number of procedures and of technical development in recent years. It has been described as “the operation of the 20th century” for the excellent results, the high satisfaction of the patients and the improvement of the quality of life.A lot of variations have been introduced over the last few decades in THA especially in terms of indications (both in younger and older patients), techniques and devices (approaches, tissue preservation, biomaterials and industrial finishing), per-operative management (blood loss and pain control) and post-operative protocols (the so called “fast track” surgery). Looking at all these advances the emerging question is: have all of them been justified both in terms of improvement of the results for the patients and of the cost/benefit ratio from an economical point of view?The purpose of this paper is to critically analyse the advantages and the disadvantages of the theoretically proposed “advances in hip arthroplasty” and attempt to understand which are justified of such “advances” nowadays, based on the international and the European perspective with a focus on the author’s personal clinical experience.Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;2. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.170008. Originally published online at www.efortopenreviews.org

show abstract

Which Implant Should We Use for Primary Total Hip Replacement?

Abstract: We recommend that surgeons performing a primary total hip replacement use an implant that outperforms the NICE benchmarks.

Cited by 27 publications

References 97 publications

YouTube provides irrelevant information for the diagnosis and treatment of hip arthritis

YouTube provides irrelevant information for the diagnosis and treatment of hip arthritis

National and International Postmarket Research and Surveillance Implementation

Advances in hip arthroplasty surgery: what is justified?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About